2026-01-08 01:24:10

$GIGGLE's sharp decline has completely crushed those voices that once hyped it up. To be honest, this coin is essentially a clone project, and going to zero is not really surprising.

The problem lies in many people's trading methods. The square is filled with bullish sentiment; some people see a couple of K-line charts and rush in to do swing trading, with leverage turned up really high. What's the difference between this approach and simply going to zero? I've seen too many people who have no data analysis support at all, relying solely on a small trend or a few candlesticks to make heavy bets.

Any slight wind can change their judgment. Such trading logic makes losing money inevitable sooner or later. I personally prefer a medium to long-term mindset when trading, and I’ve never been very interested in emotion-driven swing trading. High leverage combined with blindly opening orders often results in liquidation. Instead of following the trend, it’s better to spend more time studying fundamentals and technical data—that’s the basic skill for survival.

GIGGLE-5,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoonRocketman

· 5h ago

In simple terms, the recent decline of $GIGGLE is a classic example of RSI momentum completely exhausted and the upper band of the Bollinger Bands collapsing. Those who went all-in based on just two candlesticks on the K-line haven't even considered escape velocity...

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 01-08 01:50

There's nothing wrong with that; this wave of $GIGGLE$ holders indeed should reflect on themselves. Blindly trading on swings is gambling; don't blame the coin for not performing. High-leverage players will eventually be forced out; this is an iron law. Those who truly make money do so quietly by studying the fundamentals, not by shouting signals every day. Altcoins are inherently risky; if you haven't done your homework, don't touch them.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityLarry

· 01-08 01:39

Well said, this wave definitely deserves it. I've seen too many people go all-in on a single candlestick, then cry and shout for help. If you get liquidated, so be it. Someone has to pay the tuition. The key is that if you play like this next time, that's just being truly foolish. Buying blindly without data support, who can you blame? Deciding to go all-in based on a 5-minute candlestick chart, I really respect that kind of guts. Mid-to-long-term holds are indeed more attractive, much more reliable than this gambling-style swing trading. Leverage without thinking is my biggest takeaway. Altcoins are like this; going to zero is the norm, okay? The key is that some people will never learn, jumping into the fire pit again and again. Not studying fundamentals and just trading based on emotions, sooner or later, it will end badly. This kind of trading is more like gambling than investing.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-08 01:35

Honestly, those who open high leverage on candlestick charts are gambling, not trading. There are plenty of zero-sum coins like GIGGLE, but the problem is greed that keeps the hands from stopping. --- Another emotional-driven swing trader, how sad. Going all-in without fundamental support is not trading, it's suicide. --- Mid-to-long-term is the right path; short-term traders will eventually pay tuition. Seeing too many liquidations, I am speechless. --- Leverage is really a tool that amplifies greed. Zero-sum coins are not a big deal, but destroying your mentality is the most terrifying. --- Bullish frenzy, bearish profit-taking, and no one wants to seriously study the fundamentals? Truly astonishing. --- That's why I don't do swing trading. One candle determines my wealth, I can't live that way. --- Most people who get liquidated have stepped on these points—emotions, high leverage, lack of data. Learn from them to survive longer.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-08 01:25

The irony is that every time, someone thinks they can see through the big picture with just a glance at the candlestick charts, and then the sound of liquidation echoes in the group. Data shows that the liquidation rate of high leverage traders is even higher than the death rate of altcoins themselves. Isn't that a joke... Relying on two candlesticks to make a heavy bet? I directly suggest everyone to first study the list of tragedies from the last bubble cycle before talking about swing trading. Interesting, another project that relies on emotional trading, but the problem has never been the coin itself, it's people's brains being waterlogged. Not to offend, but anyone who has done fundamental analysis wouldn't be liquidated twice by the altcoin leek...

View OriginalReply0