On the 7th day of trading, continue operating LISA with a single transaction of 1026U, and the remaining balance reaches 131076U. This time, I deliberately adjusted the trading plan—originally it was 6 days with 132,000 + 9 days with 66,000, now changed to 7 days with 132,000 + 8 days with 66,000. Although it seems like a small change, each cycle can gain an extra 7 points, which is crucial for the subsequent airdrop score distribution.



Why am I so concerned about a few points? Because the score ultimately determines competitiveness. High scores like 260+ or 290+ in the early stages indeed make it easier to grab airdrops, but after participating a few times, the score will drop to around 247 points. This position is interesting—it’s harder to collide with integers like 246, 245, 241, 240. After subtracting 15 points, it further drops to 232 points, which, by the same logic, has an advantage over 231, 230, 226, 225.

Today's fee calculation is also worth reviewing. For a trading volume of 131076U, since it’s in the 4x points tier, the actual calculation base is 131072 ÷ 4 = 32768U. With a fee rate of 0.02%: 32768 × 0.0002 = 6.5536U. The final consumption is 6.56U (precise value 6.55514U), which fully meets expectations. These details may seem insignificant, but the difference will be visible in the monthly profit statistics.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SocialFiQueenvip
· 01-10 01:35
Wow, the level of detail obsession is incredible. The idea of occupying the 247 points is truly genius; most people wouldn't think of it.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-09 10:05
It's another operation that blocks the position. I remember the number 247 points. Looks like I need to think it over.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuildervip
· 01-08 01:55
Wow, a score of 247 for this ranking is incredible; it's definitely harder to hit than a whole number.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeakervip
· 01-08 01:51
Wow, your attention to detail is impressive. Only a player like you would think of that—it's brilliant how you realized that scoring and positioning make it harder to collide than with integers.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearchervip
· 01-08 01:31
Wow, the knowledge needed to avoid pitfalls at this score is really deep. The 247 position is indeed absolute, harder to hit than that bunch of integers.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)