2026-01-08 02:22:43

The Bitcoin mining industry has released new data. According to the latest statistics, the well-known mining company CleanSpark produced 622 BTC in December 2025, a significant increase from 587 BTC in November. The company's total output for the entire year of 2025 reached 7,746 Bitcoins — a remarkable achievement.

What’s more noteworthy is their selling strategy. In December, CleanSpark chose to sell 577 Bitcoins, generating approximately $51.46 million in cash flow. This approach ensured cash reserves while avoiding excessive depletion of their holdings. By the end of 2025, the company's total Bitcoin holdings slightly increased to 13,099 BTC.

From this data, it can be seen that with adjustments in mining difficulty and optimization of electricity costs, the production stability of leading mining companies is significantly improving. Continuous accumulation of Bitcoin combined with flexible cash-out strategies makes this mining model more robust in the current market environment.

BTC1,36%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletsWatcher

· 01-11 01:04

Mining giants are really doing bottom fishing, mining and selling steadily... This is the smart money's playbook. --- CleanSpark has this rhythm perfectly under control. I believe in this steady strategy. --- 7746 coins... Just looking at this number makes me dizzy. --- Can I buy more after selling? I finally understand the logic of mining companies. --- Top mining companies are really lying flat and winning. The difficulty is so high that small investors have no way out. --- While cash flow is recovering, they are still accumulating coins. This is the correct mining posture. --- Why do I always feel like big mining companies are just harvesting... Watching their steady approach makes me uneasy. --- 13099 BTC... How long would it take to break even? --- What does this data indicate? It just shows that having money means winning. --- Gotta admit, the top players definitely have an advantage. The cost control gap is huge.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-08 09:47

CleanSpark's approach is quite clever—mining more and being willing to sell, maintaining healthy cash flow while accumulating coins. This is the strategy of leading mining companies, right? The real money-making machine is knowing how to balance tension and relaxation, unlike some small miners who go all-in on one path. 13,099 BTC, wow, this holding amount is truly impressive. Handshake's cost optimization is indeed in place, and the difficulty has also started to improve. We still need to keep an eye on the electricity costs, after all, cost leadership is key.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 01-08 02:52

Selling 577 units and still increasing holdings—this strategy is truly brilliant. It ensures steady cash flow while accumulating coins. Live smart.

View OriginalReply0

MEVVictimAlliance

· 01-08 02:51

CleanSpark's move this time is indeed impressive, with mining output stabilizing and knowing how to sell... By the way, is this continuous accumulation waiting for the wind to come? 13,099 coins, makes me itch to buy Mining companies are starting to play flexible cash-out strategies, while retail investors are still debating when to sell, which is a bit awkward However, the difficulty adjustment in mining really puts a lot of pressure on small miners...

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersPaper

· 01-08 02:47

Damn, CleanSpark's rhythm is really like digging one hand and selling one hand for a steady life. I'm still debating whether to cut my losses...

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 01-08 02:46

CleanSpark's strategy is truly top-notch. Combining mining and selling coins allows for both profit-taking and holding more, very clever. Leading mining companies are just good at accounting. Optimizing electricity costs immediately boosts production capacity. Retail investors like us can’t compare. 7,746 coins in a year? I’ll have to mine until the Year of the Monkey or later. Cash out over 50 million and still increase holdings—this is long-termism. Not like those rookies rushing to sell everything. Difficulty adjustment + cost optimization = stable cash flow. Mining companies are becoming more professional. Coins sold can generate income again. Holding 13,099 Bitcoins—this company really has confidence. An increase in output month-over-month indicates market improvement. Miners are regaining their vitality.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-08 02:35

Nima, CleanSpark's operation is really top-notch. Selling and cashing out without hurting the holdings—that's the right way to play mining. --- 13,099 BTC... How long will it take to accumulate that? I'm envious. --- Leading mining companies are stable and steady; retail miners have long since run away. The landscape is different. --- A month-on-month increase of 622 coins? Looks like the difficulty adjustment is effective. These big players are really good at操盘. --- $51.46 million cash flow shows that understanding liquidity is still crucial. --- Flexible cashing out is really a skill—survive and accumulate. No wonder they’ve made it this far. --- Annual production of 7,746 coins? I can't even earn one with my life. --- Is this what you call a stable mining model? I feel like it's still about scale and cost advantages crushing the competition. --- Holdings have broken 13,000 coins. Mining companies are the kind of players that can sustain themselves. --- Difficulty adjustment + cost optimization = dominating the top. Small mining farms really have no future.

View OriginalReply0

MissingSats

· 01-08 02:30

CleanSpark's move is indeed quite clever—selling to exchange for USD without losing holdings. This is the right way to mine.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-08 02:27

From the data performance, the selling strategy behind CleanSpark hides an incentive misalignment issue — they sold 577 coins but only increased their holdings partially. What does this indicate? It suggests that market pricing power still remains in the hands of institutions. According to the Tokenomics framework in the white paper, this asymmetric cash-out pattern actually carries systemic risks in a high-volatility environment. What’s truly noteworthy is why leading mining companies dare to operate this way. If the assumption holds, it means they have already mastered the equilibrium in the difficulty adjustment cycle. The governance mechanism involved behind this... I recommend everyone first understand the DAO governance logic of hash rate distribution, otherwise it’s easy to be deceived by the surface "stability."

View OriginalReply0