From a technical implementation perspective, PBS, while addressing certain MEV issues, has revealed many drawbacks in practical applications—high verification overhead, complexity, and the fact that the centralization risk has not been truly eliminated. In contrast, the TEE solution provides more direct privacy protection and transaction isolation capabilities through a trusted execution environment, with better execution efficiency. Given the current trade-offs, the design approach of TEE seems to better align with the original decentralization intent of blockchain, at least with fewer pitfalls encountered in engineering practice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleDreamer
· 01-09 16:19
TEE is really awesome, the PBS setup is too complicated, and the verification cost is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 01-09 05:55
That PBS stuff is indeed a bit too high and not quite right... I believe in TEE.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 01-08 20:02
That PBS thing sounds good in theory, but in practice it's a hot potato. TEE is still the better choice.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 01-08 20:02
TEE really impressed me; PBS's complicated setup should have been replaced long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 01-08 19:49
The verification overhead of that PBS system is really outrageous; is TEE still more reliable?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 01-08 19:40
Haha, the PBS system is getting more and more complicated the more I use it. There's no way around the decentralization pit.
From a technical implementation perspective, PBS, while addressing certain MEV issues, has revealed many drawbacks in practical applications—high verification overhead, complexity, and the fact that the centralization risk has not been truly eliminated. In contrast, the TEE solution provides more direct privacy protection and transaction isolation capabilities through a trusted execution environment, with better execution efficiency. Given the current trade-offs, the design approach of TEE seems to better align with the original decentralization intent of blockchain, at least with fewer pitfalls encountered in engineering practice.