The multi-pool liquidity architecture is becoming a new direction for DEX innovation. Taking a certain project as an example, by constructing multiple liquidity pools across different trading pairs and leveraging price differences between pools to trigger on-chain arbitrage mechanisms—automated bots continuously perform arbitrage to balance the pools, which directly translates into trading depth. With active trading, the project's economic model can operate coherently: LP providers receive trading dividends, and a floor price support mechanism prevents extreme volatility. This design is essentially a deflationary + incentive positive feedback loop—token holders can participate in liquidity mining and also gain appreciation potential through the deflationary expectations at the mechanism level. It’s like embedding a self-reinforcing cycle into token economics, theoretically capable of generating autonomous growth momentum. #MSCI未排除数字资产财库企业纳入范围 $BTC $BNB
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkMaster
· 01-12 02:10
Ha, "self-driven growth momentum"? It sounds to me like just another self-congratulatory model. It'll reveal its true nature when the bear market comes.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 01-12 02:03
It's the same old tune of deflation + mining again. It all sounds great, but how many can actually get off the ground?
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 01-11 14:37
It's the same self-reinforcing cycle story again—sounds good, but how many actually manage to make it work?
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 01-10 18:32
It sounds like a good arbitrage idea, but I've seen too many crashes with this kind of deflationary mechanism.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-09 02:40
It's that multi-pool architecture again... Sounds pretty good, but how does it perform in reality? How much can the minute fluctuations be when robots are arbitrage trading?
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 01-09 02:39
It's the same old routine of a deflationary cycle. Sounds good, but in reality, it all depends on who runs away first.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 01-09 02:31
The logic of multi-pool liquidity sounds great, but how many projects can truly be self-consistent? Most are still just self-entertainment.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-09 02:28
Is this old story of deflation + incentives really self-sustaining? No matter how I see it, it seems more like a game of pass-the-parcel.
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteran
· 01-09 02:26
It's that same self-reinforcing cycle again, hearing it so much that my ears are getting calloused... I used to believe in this too, but when the bear market came, it collapsed instantly.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 01-09 02:23
It sounds like the same self-perpetuating narrative again. Can LPs really win steadily, or is this another round of harvesting profits?
The multi-pool liquidity architecture is becoming a new direction for DEX innovation. Taking a certain project as an example, by constructing multiple liquidity pools across different trading pairs and leveraging price differences between pools to trigger on-chain arbitrage mechanisms—automated bots continuously perform arbitrage to balance the pools, which directly translates into trading depth. With active trading, the project's economic model can operate coherently: LP providers receive trading dividends, and a floor price support mechanism prevents extreme volatility. This design is essentially a deflationary + incentive positive feedback loop—token holders can participate in liquidity mining and also gain appreciation potential through the deflationary expectations at the mechanism level. It’s like embedding a self-reinforcing cycle into token economics, theoretically capable of generating autonomous growth momentum. #MSCI未排除数字资产财库企业纳入范围 $BTC $BNB