Ethereum still needs to continue evolving. Vitalik recently reiterated his vision for the future of this public chain—essentially aligning its growth path with protocols like Linux or BitTorrent.
His core idea is quite clear: maintain openness and decentralization at the foundational level without wavering, but be sufficiently aggressive and global in the application ecosystem and business models built on top. In plain language, it means preserving the purity of the protocol layer while ensuring that this system can truly serve enterprise-level users worldwide.
This is not just idealistic rhetoric. After years of scaling efforts and various trade-offs, the Ethereum team seems to have figured it out: future competition won't be about excelling in a single dimension, but about whether it can simultaneously satisfy the spirit of decentralization and business realities.
So you'll see Ethereum repositioning itself—from the grand narrative of "world computer"—gradually refining into a more concrete and actionable goal: "Global Distributed Settlement Infrastructure." It may sound less romantic, but it’s more feasible to implement.
Vitalik has been trying to find that balance throughout this process: neither abandoning the original intention of decentralization nor getting trapped in pure idealism. This pragmatic evolution may be the key to Ethereum’s long-term competitiveness.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
fork_in_the_road
· 01-11 15:42
From global computing to distributed settlement infrastructure, in simple terms, it's becoming more practical. However, this actually makes it more reliable; idealism that only talks without action is indeed pointless.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 01-09 02:54
To be honest, compared to those who keep touting the "World Computer" all day long, I prefer Vitalik's practical approach.
Pragmatic is better than just dreaming.
But to be fair, how difficult are the two words to actually build a global settlement infrastructure?
Let's watch and see how they execute the follow-up.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebel
· 01-09 02:54
To be honest, V God’s approach is quite pragmatic. Shrinking from the "world computer" to "distributed settlement infrastructure" may not sound as glamorous, but it’s definitely more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 01-09 02:54
Listen, listen, Vitalik's words are spot on. Changing from "world computer" to "settlement infrastructure" is just speaking the truth.
Wait, can this kind of balance really be found, or will we have to go through another round of tinkering?
The term "pragmatic evolution" is well used, but how can retail investors follow along?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 01-09 02:52
That's true, but pragmatic as it is, where are the truly implementable applications?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeater
· 01-09 02:46
Good morning, the idealism at 3 a.m. sounds pretty cheap; it's better to talk about the arbitrage ranges that got eaten up in the gas wars.
---
Vitalik is telling stories again. The real question is who actually cares about the purity of the protocol layer—liquidity traps are the real issue.
---
Distributed settlement infrastructure? Sounds like just a fancy name for tipping miners.
---
Alright, I believe it. This time, it's really not just empty words... just like the scalability solutions we discussed last time.
---
Everyone is looking for a balance point, but the midnight arbitrage bots have already made their fill. Don’t believe it? Check the dark pool trading volume.
---
From the world computer to the settlement layer, it seems these past few years have been about adjusting the narrative. Arbitrageurs have seen through it all.
---
Pragmatic evolution, in simple terms, is bowing to commercial realities. What about the spirit of decentralization? It was gone long ago in the sandwich attack.
Ethereum still needs to continue evolving. Vitalik recently reiterated his vision for the future of this public chain—essentially aligning its growth path with protocols like Linux or BitTorrent.
His core idea is quite clear: maintain openness and decentralization at the foundational level without wavering, but be sufficiently aggressive and global in the application ecosystem and business models built on top. In plain language, it means preserving the purity of the protocol layer while ensuring that this system can truly serve enterprise-level users worldwide.
This is not just idealistic rhetoric. After years of scaling efforts and various trade-offs, the Ethereum team seems to have figured it out: future competition won't be about excelling in a single dimension, but about whether it can simultaneously satisfy the spirit of decentralization and business realities.
So you'll see Ethereum repositioning itself—from the grand narrative of "world computer"—gradually refining into a more concrete and actionable goal: "Global Distributed Settlement Infrastructure." It may sound less romantic, but it’s more feasible to implement.
Vitalik has been trying to find that balance throughout this process: neither abandoning the original intention of decentralization nor getting trapped in pure idealism. This pragmatic evolution may be the key to Ethereum’s long-term competitiveness.