Iran's nationwide internet blackout revelation: Will satellite networks become the ultimate lifeline for the crypto world?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】There have been new developments in Iran’s situation over the past couple of days. Starting from 18:45 UTC, the country’s internet traffic almost plummeted—Cloudflare’s data is very clear, almost completely dropping to zero. This is not a technical failure, but a nationwide digital blockade implemented by the authorities.

The situation is not simple. High inflation, currency devaluation, and skyrocketing living costs—these pressures have built up to a breaking point. Recently, the exiled crown prince called for large-scale protests, further escalating the situation, which eventually evolved into what we see now.

Interestingly, many people are asking a question: Can satellite internet like SpaceX’s Starlink be used in Iran? It’s still uncertain. But this situation also gives us an insight—when the internet is cut off, decentralized communication methods become especially critical. For the entire Web3 community, this is a significant real-world case worth observing. NetBlocks describes this as a “nationwide digital blockade,” which will severely restrict the flow of information.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
shadowy_supercodervip
· 01-11 17:00
Satellite Network Savior? Well... sounds good, but in reality, if the government really wants to block it, there's nothing they can do. The truly impressive solution still depends on on-chain communication; that's the long-term strategy. The Iran internet blackout was actually foreseeable; centralized systems are ultimately unreliable. Starlink is impressive, but it still depends on the authorities' mood; Web3 is the future. That's why I never trust traditional internet—decentralization is the only way out. Internet outages are not scary; what's scary is that people haven't realized they need true autonomy. Another real-world example tells us... hold tokens, self-custody, and go on-chain. Starlink sounds appealing, but it still has a ceiling; ultimately, it's a centralized solution. If we really delve into this topic, it's much more complex than it seems. Satellite networks? Not enough. What we need is a completely decentralized underlying architecture.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteranvip
· 01-10 06:36
Satellite internet, to put it simply, is a trump card that governments can't play. If fully deployed, the Iranian regime would also be panicked. Real cases are in front of us; Web3 should have taken this seriously long ago. In the era of internet disconnection, whoever controls communication controls the discourse. This is the ultimate meaning of decentralization. If Starlink can truly break through Iran's blockade, that would be incredible, but the dream is still worth having. Wait, could this instead push governments worldwide to accelerate regulation of satellite networks? So, the free internet is always fighting back, an endless battle. Once again, being forced to become a political tool—crypto circles get caught in the crossfire.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHuntervip
· 01-09 03:29
Satellite networks sound appealing, but can they really be used at critical moments? Iran's recent internet shutdown actually highlights the importance of decentralized communication. --- Starlink's viability in authoritarian countries is a concern, but this incident definitely serves as a wake-up call for Web3. --- Having no internet might not have mattered ten years ago, but now it directly threatens the lifeline of the crypto ecosystem. That’s the real risk. --- Honestly, satellite internet is still too idealistic at this stage, but at least the proof of concept is there. --- When Iran's entire internet is cut off, I realize that mesh networks or on-chain communication might be the way to go. --- That's why we need things like Helium; we can't always rely on Starlink. --- Wait, here’s the question—if satellite networks are found to be used for bypassing censorship, will authorities just block the sky?
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 01-09 03:26
Web3 that can't even withstand being offline, and still dares to boast about decentralization? The reality is so heartbreaking. --- Starlink can save lives but can't boost the coin price, haha. --- Here we go again, every time there's an incident, they hype up satellite network topics. --- This wave in Iran really serves as a wake-up call for us; the dangers of centralization are right in front of us. --- Instead of waiting for Starlink, it's better to manage your wallet properly first. --- This is the true meaning of Web3's existence, but it has been overlooked by most people. --- Only when offline do we realize what true decentralization needs are. --- Sounds nice, but when that time comes, who will be able to use satellite networks? Ordinary people will still be left to die. --- Maybe that's an overinterpretation; Iran has plenty of ways to bypass censorship. --- Anyway, this is how our crypto world is—becoming increasingly dependent on infrastructure.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 01-09 03:22
The issue of disconnection truly exposes the fragility of centralized internet... If Starlink can actually be used in Iran, that would be incredible. But on the other hand, this incident indeed highlights the practical need for decentralized communication.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)