#美国贸易赤字状况 📣Speaking of $SOL this round of market, my feeling is — fighting alone is indeed exhausting, but if a group of people clearly define their goals and each leverage their strengths to execute, it’s a completely different story. No one can outperform the 24-hour market; a single person’s energy is limited to just a few hours. Could a different approach be more efficient?
I always adhere to a principle: only look at real data, and never be vague about entry points. The biggest fear in trading is ambiguous strategies — when the support and resistance levels are ridiculously wide, and even if I’m right or wrong, I can justify it. This kind of trial-and-error space is boundless, and you simply don’t know which direction to take.
Back to specific operations — initiating a long position at 134.1, with the current target already at 139, gaining a 5-point margin. The current approach is to partially take profit and then adjust the stop-loss to the cost price to protect the principal, while the remaining position continues to push towards the second-tier resistance level. This way, actions are justified, and it feels more reassuring.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LidoStakeAddict
· 9h ago
Reliable trading logic, without any self-deceiving tricks, I appreciate it.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMaster
· 14h ago
It’s true that I can't beat it with a single person intraday, but I have to be honest about this logic—earning 5 points from 134 to 139, and still having to take profits in batches to protect the principal. It sounds stable, but the return rate is a bit exhausting.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 01-09 03:50
134.1 to 139, really solid
The team copying work is indeed fast, monitoring alone is too exhausting
Data speaks for itself, those vague strategies are just a trap
Take profit and stop loss in coordination, details determine life or death
This wave's rhythm is well grasped, keep pushing towards the resistance level
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 01-09 03:46
134 to 139 is how we took it, and we still need to keep pushing higher.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 01-09 03:46
The wave from 134 to 139 is indeed stable, but the real test is whether we can hold it.
---
Team collaboration is the right approach; watching the market alone is too exhausting. Division of labor is the key.
---
I like the move of setting stop-loss at the cost price; at least psychologically, it won't be too painful.
---
The strategy of setting the pressure level so wide that it’s almost limitless is really annoying, just leaving yourself an escape route.
---
A 5% profit is steady; the current question is whether the second tier can break through.
---
I agree with the data-centric approach, but the market changes in an instant. Even the clearest data sometimes requires humility.
---
When a group of people share the same goal, their execution ability improves. This is true; retail investors are too easily overwhelmed by emotions.
---
Partially taking profits is wise; don’t be greedy and give away what you’ve earned.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-09 03:33
134.1 went in, 5 points came out. This hand is indeed steady; people who are not greedy live longer.
#美国贸易赤字状况 📣Speaking of $SOL this round of market, my feeling is — fighting alone is indeed exhausting, but if a group of people clearly define their goals and each leverage their strengths to execute, it’s a completely different story. No one can outperform the 24-hour market; a single person’s energy is limited to just a few hours. Could a different approach be more efficient?
I always adhere to a principle: only look at real data, and never be vague about entry points. The biggest fear in trading is ambiguous strategies — when the support and resistance levels are ridiculously wide, and even if I’m right or wrong, I can justify it. This kind of trial-and-error space is boundless, and you simply don’t know which direction to take.
Back to specific operations — initiating a long position at 134.1, with the current target already at 139, gaining a 5-point margin. The current approach is to partially take profit and then adjust the stop-loss to the cost price to protect the principal, while the remaining position continues to push towards the second-tier resistance level. This way, actions are justified, and it feels more reassuring.