2026-01-09 03:22:00

It's really trending, and this privacy topic is once again in the spotlight.

Imagine—a technology that allows financial transactions to occur in a closed environment where everyone can see that a transaction is happening, but no one can peek into the specific details. This is what Dusk Network is doing—a privacy blockchain tailored for financial applications.

Using technical means to build a protective wall around user privacy—that's what blockchain should look like. The Chinese community's enthusiasm for the concept of privacy has returned, which also indicates that the demand for financial privacy protection is indeed growing.

DUSK14,16%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsDetective

· 13h ago

Privacy is indeed something that should be valued, but whether Dusk can truly be implemented depends on subsequent actions. Speaking of which, there are a lot of projects claiming to focus on privacy now, but few have actually been realized. This protective wall sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT coin scheme. Has Dusk considered the balance between compromise and practicality? Privacy + finance dual tags, enough of a gimmick, but what about the technology?

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 16h ago

Privacy, you know, I'm really afraid of being late. Is it already too late to get in now? Wait, I feel like I've heard the logic of Dusk's closed environment several times before. Can it really be implemented this time? It's called a protective wall in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's just hiding from regulation. The Chinese community says there's high demand, but they're probably just betting on price increases. I am optimistic about the privacy track, but honestly, why can Dusk Network stand out from the crowd? Financial privacy is important, but the real issue is that only a few people truly understand the technology.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-09 19:14

Privacy is definitely something that needs to be taken seriously. Otherwise, transaction records are exposed to everyone – it's terrifying. Dusk's technology sounds pretty promising, but I'm worried it'll just end up being another concept coin. To be honest, financial privacy demand is so huge, so why do so many projects end up being all talk and no action? Confidential transactions sound great in theory, but can they actually deliver, or is it just another round of vaporware? This is what blockchain should actually be doing, not constantly pumping out concept hype. It's no surprise privacy is making a comeback – everyone's been burned before. Sure, the topic gets a lot of attention, but there are very few projects that actually solve the problem. Personally, I trust solid, tangible privacy protections more than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

BTCRetirementFund

· 01-09 03:51

Privacy really needs to be emphasized; otherwise, it just feels like we're constantly being watched. However, Dusk's logic sounds pretty good; if it can truly be implemented, that would be even better. Financial privacy, now that's the area where competition really matters. The analogy of a closed space is quite vivid; it helps to understand it better. Basically, it's about wanting a sense of freedom, right? Not making all transactions transparent and crystal clear.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-09 03:48

Privacy protection definitely deserves attention, but is Dusk just another hype concept? Anyway, the key is how to balance transparency and privacy. Wow, they're talking about enclosed spaces again. Feels like I've heard this phrase a hundred times in the past two months. Privacy firewall sounds good, but ultimately it depends on how well it can be implemented in practice. The Chinese community loves to hype privacy, but how many people are actually using it? Wait, can this thing prevent regulation? That might be what everyone really cares about.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 01-09 03:28

Privacy has been a topic for so many years, but there are still too few projects that can truly be implemented... Whether Dusk is reliable or not still depends on its future performance. Speaking of which, financial privacy is indeed a necessity, but I'm just worried it might be another hype-driven scheme. It seems every time privacy gains popularity, it quickly fades away, and there are very few real users. I understand the logic of closed transactions, but do ordinary users really care? Or is it just another wave of rug pulls? Forget it, let's keep an eye on it. Maybe our community can discuss what advantages Dusk really has... A firewall is a firewall, but the biggest concern is still your own wallet.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 01-09 03:22

Privacy chains are back to ride the hype, but the problem is that RSI is almost overbought. It's wise to be cautious about implementation. The angle coefficient of Dusk is quite interesting. The trading mode in enclosed spaces indeed hits the pain points, but it remains to be seen how long the main upward wave can sustain. This wave of privacy topic hype feels like it’s hovering in low Earth orbit; only a breakout of the neckline will count. Finally, some chains are seriously building privacy protection walls, which is much more reliable than those purely炒概念. Privacy demand is indeed warming up, but I haven't seen projects with enough escape velocity. Let's wait and see when the fuel injection opportunity comes.

View OriginalReply0