The token distribution mechanism needs serious rework. The wallet allocation strategy isn't functioning properly—splitting wallets should be handled more systematically. Until this infrastructure issue gets resolved, market adoption will face real friction. Current setup makes it difficult for investors to take the project seriously. The dev team needs to address these technical gaps before expecting meaningful community participation or trading volume.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerRugResistant
· 11h ago
It's the same old story again... The wallet mechanism is so bad, no wonder no one plays it.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 01-09 03:54
The consultation records show that this project's allocation mechanism indeed has complications — the wallet splitting strategy is essentially ineffective. The infrastructure needs to be solidified first; otherwise, the subsequent liquidity indicators will only continue to deteriorate.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 01-09 03:48
Is the wallet mechanism this bad... No wonder no one is playing.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 01-09 03:40
The infrastructure is really terrible. How do you expect to attract investors?
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 01-09 03:26
The infrastructure is so bad, and you still want volume? Wake up, buddy.
The token distribution mechanism needs serious rework. The wallet allocation strategy isn't functioning properly—splitting wallets should be handled more systematically. Until this infrastructure issue gets resolved, market adoption will face real friction. Current setup makes it difficult for investors to take the project seriously. The dev team needs to address these technical gaps before expecting meaningful community participation or trading volume.