The harsh truth of Web3 is right in front of us: quickly cashing out through inflated valuations is far easier than building a self-sustaining business.
Just look at the data. 99% of Web3 projects have no real cash flow, yet they spend heavily on marketing and events. Where does this money come from? Tokens and fundraising, not product revenue.
Where is the problem? Too many projects rush to launch tokens and go public. Once the tokens are circulating, marketing budgets skyrocket. To boost the token price, project teams must create hype and spend money on activities. But the consequence is that the core product becomes marginalized, and competitiveness declines.
Careful examination of that 1% of truly profitable projects shows that their price-to-earnings ratios are actually quite reasonable. Conversely, the remaining 99% of projects cannot withstand such valuation scrutiny.
The root of the real problem lies in the mechanism design of early token issuance (TGE). Founders achieve quick liquidity through TGE—regardless of whether the project succeeds or fails, they’ve already cashed out. This has led to a distorted cycle: investor losses fuel the entire system.
Therefore, projects that can survive must have a prerequisite: proven revenue-generating capability. Projects without genuine users or actual sales will eventually be seen through by token holders. The market is maturing rapidly, and investors are no longer fooled by hollow visions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractHunter
· 01-09 03:58
That hits too close to home. This is my true feeling after seeing so many projects fail.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 01-09 03:56
99% of the projects are just vaporware; the founders have long since run away.
By the way, this TGE mechanism is really brilliant—it's completely a scam to fleece investors.
Only that 1% actually generate revenue; the rest are just burning through funding to stay afloat.
Honestly, whether there are real users or product income can be seen at a glance.
These vaporware projects should have been regulated long ago; too many people have been scammed.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 01-09 03:55
Exactly right, 99% of projects are just gambling, and the founders have long run away.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 01-09 03:52
99% of projects are just a facade; the founders have long since run away.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-09 03:34
I should have known earlier that the project team is making a fortune while retail investors are being quickly harvested. I just want to know, when will we catch that 1% of truly substantial projects? Or are we simply here to be the ones running alongside?
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmpty
· 01-09 03:29
To be honest, this is the common problem of the project that got "cut" during the wave two years ago... rushing to go public, rushing to create hype, rushing to harvest the profits, but not a single one has figured out how to make money.
The harsh truth of Web3 is right in front of us: quickly cashing out through inflated valuations is far easier than building a self-sustaining business.
Just look at the data. 99% of Web3 projects have no real cash flow, yet they spend heavily on marketing and events. Where does this money come from? Tokens and fundraising, not product revenue.
Where is the problem? Too many projects rush to launch tokens and go public. Once the tokens are circulating, marketing budgets skyrocket. To boost the token price, project teams must create hype and spend money on activities. But the consequence is that the core product becomes marginalized, and competitiveness declines.
Careful examination of that 1% of truly profitable projects shows that their price-to-earnings ratios are actually quite reasonable. Conversely, the remaining 99% of projects cannot withstand such valuation scrutiny.
The root of the real problem lies in the mechanism design of early token issuance (TGE). Founders achieve quick liquidity through TGE—regardless of whether the project succeeds or fails, they’ve already cashed out. This has led to a distorted cycle: investor losses fuel the entire system.
Therefore, projects that can survive must have a prerequisite: proven revenue-generating capability. Projects without genuine users or actual sales will eventually be seen through by token holders. The market is maturing rapidly, and investors are no longer fooled by hollow visions.