Walrus as an ecosystem product of Mysten Labs is natively compatible with Sui's Move smart contract language. What does this native interoperability mean for developers? Simply put: it's awesome.
When writing contracts on Sui, you can directly and atomically control data permissions in the Walrus storage layer. It sounds abstract, but it becomes clear with a different scenario. Imagine an NFT trading platform where sellers upload high-resolution original images to Walrus, and the platform sets a contract: only buyers who have paid royalties can download the watermark-free large images from the node.
This logic may seem simple, but its power is immense—binding "asset ownership" and "data access rights" directly at the code level, something traditional cloud storage cannot do. You no longer need to maintain complex backend servers, database permission systems, or write a bunch of API authentication logic. On-chain contracts are the complete solution.
This kind of development experience will attract many Web2 engineers to explore Web3 out of curiosity. Not because of idealism, but because it truly saves effort—solving more complex problems with less code. This is the real value of composability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenAlchemist
· 01-10 22:51
ngl this is actually interesting — native interop between move and walrus means you're basically eliminating the entire auth middleware layer. that's not just "convenient," that's a legitimate inefficiency vector closing right before our eyes. most devs don't even realize how much waste they're burning through pointless backend overhead.
Reply0
DataOnlooker
· 01-09 03:57
Alright, finally something that can truly save effort compared to traditional solutions, not just empty slogans.
It's real combat, doing more complex tasks with less code—that's the real reason to attract Web2 users.
One word: indeed satisfying. Honestly, it's much more reliable than those academic-level whitepapers.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 01-09 03:56
Wow, this is truly a blessing for lazy people. No more writing those crappy backend authentication logics.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 01-09 03:54
This is what Web3 should look like—handling permissions directly at the contract level, no need to write backend code every day, so annoying.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-09 03:33
Wow, this is truly on-chain native, not some forcibly on-chain stuff. Managing permissions directly in the contract saves a lot of backend code. I'm a fan of Walrus for this wave.
Walrus as an ecosystem product of Mysten Labs is natively compatible with Sui's Move smart contract language. What does this native interoperability mean for developers? Simply put: it's awesome.
When writing contracts on Sui, you can directly and atomically control data permissions in the Walrus storage layer. It sounds abstract, but it becomes clear with a different scenario. Imagine an NFT trading platform where sellers upload high-resolution original images to Walrus, and the platform sets a contract: only buyers who have paid royalties can download the watermark-free large images from the node.
This logic may seem simple, but its power is immense—binding "asset ownership" and "data access rights" directly at the code level, something traditional cloud storage cannot do. You no longer need to maintain complex backend servers, database permission systems, or write a bunch of API authentication logic. On-chain contracts are the complete solution.
This kind of development experience will attract many Web2 engineers to explore Web3 out of curiosity. Not because of idealism, but because it truly saves effort—solving more complex problems with less code. This is the real value of composability.