2026-01-09 03:29:43

The situation with the BOT project is starting to look suspicious. It was originally a highly popular token issuance, with well-known entities like Virtuals involved in promotion, and market expectations were high. However, on-chain data analysis results are concerning—those transaction patterns clearly do not conform to normal market-making logic.

To be straightforward, based on public blockchain records, there are obvious anomalies in trading behavior. This is not typical volatility, but something more suspicious. For a project of this scale, such on-chain performance warrants in-depth questioning. The project team needs to provide an explanation as soon as possible, or market confidence will further deteriorate. Such data anomalies often indicate problems, and we need to understand exactly what has happened as soon as possible.

BOT2,99%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHunter420

· 2h ago

On-chain data reveals issues as soon as it's pulled out; Virtuals endorsement can't save it either --- Another market-making scandal, there must be some foul play this time --- Oh my, obvious abnormal trading patterns, isn't the project team going to say something? --- Feels like BOT is about to fail, the data is right there --- This is called bad manners; no matter how big the project is, it's useless --- I knew something was off; turns out it's on-chain manipulation --- Wait, can a project of this scale still play like this? Is it real? --- Once market confidence breaks, it can't be restored; someone should have investigated earlier --- Virtuals can't push this pit, haha --- Damn, got cut again; when will we see a clean project

View OriginalReply0

ChainDetective

· 18h ago

On-chain data doesn't lie, and there's definitely something fishy with this BOT move. Another project hyped up to the sky, but the data reveals the truth once scrutinized. Virtuals endorsement can't save it either; the on-chain transaction model is so bizarre that it can't hold up. Hurry up and run, waiting for the project's "explanation." If there's no reasonable explanation this time, it will be directly confirmed.

View OriginalReply0

defi_detective

· 01-09 03:59

On-chain data triggers alerts as soon as it appears; this thing might have some tricks up its sleeve. --- Can Virtuals endorsements save the day? Then the trading model must be pretty outrageous. --- It's the same old story; the hottest projects all end up crashing due to abnormal trading. --- If the project team doesn't give a reliable explanation, I think confidence will plummet. --- Data anomalies = warning signs of a trap; better dig into it quickly. --- They say the market-making logic is flawed; I just want to know who's really playing tricks. --- On-chain records can't be fooled; this time it feels a bit sinister. --- No matter how hot the hype, it's all exposed once you look on-chain. --- Waiting for an explanation, but I think even if it comes, it might be questionable. --- Why do big projects love to play these "abnormal trading" tricks?

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 01-09 03:58

nah the on-chain patterns here are straight up sus... mempool analysis would tell us if this is just market making gone wrong or something darker tbh

Reply0

BoredStaker

· 01-09 03:58

Another coin with abnormal data? What's with this routine again --- Virtuals endorsement is useless; on-chain data will speak for itself --- This wave feels like a crash, better reduce positions to protect yourself --- Wait, is the problem serious? Or is it just hype again --- If the project team doesn't come out to explain, then they really are running --- It's always like this, abnormal data → confidence collapse → rug pull --- I just want to know, is this a technical issue or is there something fishy --- Why is this routine coming again, BOT really can't handle this --- Is it still possible to act now? Feels like it's going to be over --- Forget it, I don't even want to look at this kind of coin, too suspicious

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 01-09 03:58

Here we go again with the same tricks, Virtuals endorsement is useless --- On-chain data is all there, this wave is probably going to break the peg --- Wait, is this data real... feels a bit suspicious --- Is the project team not coming out to speak? This is really uncomfortable --- Virtuals also had a rug pull before, not surprising --- I just want to know who is actually dumping --- +1 for the candidate to cut losses, this doesn't feel right --- Holders are probably freaking out right now haha --- With such obvious issues in on-chain transactions, how can anyone dare to buy the dip --- Another one, this quarter's routine of cutting the leeks is the same --- Hurry up and calm down, getting too anxious --- Looking at the data, it reminds me of that certain coin last time...

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-09 03:57

On-chain data has been exposed as soon as it came out; this wave of BOTs is probably going to fail.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapy

· 01-09 03:56

My goodness, Virtuals endorsements can't even stop on-chain data from lying, how outrageous is that? By the way, why does BOT feel so套路味 this time? I need to撤 quickly. It's another "high expectations met with reality slap" script, so annoying. It's clearly written on-chain, yet you're still遮遮掩掩, what are you thinking? I've seen this kind of abnormal trading pattern many times, and usually it's not a good sign.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-09 03:50

On-chain data is so obvious that it can be seen clearly, and Virtuals endorsement is just a waste.

View OriginalReply0