2026-01-09 03:40:17

#密码资产动态追踪 Origins Chain has completed a dual upgrade of its branding and technological system, officially transforming into Origins Network.

From a simple execution layer to a complete network system that covers computing, proxy, identity verification, and coordination mechanisms—this reflects the gradual maturity of Web3 infrastructure. To give an analogy, it has evolved from a chain that can only handle transactions to a network capable of managing complex scenarios such as identity verification, resource coordination, and multi-party collaboration. Such architectural upgrades are not uncommon in the current crypto market, as more and more projects realize the limitations of single functions and begin to build more resilient and comprehensive ecological matrices.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BasementAlchemist

· 1h ago

It sounds like another wave of "Universal Chain" marketing tactics, upgrading from a transaction chain to "identity verification + resource coordination"? It sounds good, but how much can actually be implemented? --- Another project to reshape the brand. I'm already tired of this kind of operation. The key is whether it can really be put into use. --- Eco-matrix, architecture upgrades—these words are flying everywhere lately, but only a few can truly change the market landscape. --- From Origins Chain to Origins Network, can this name change bring real benefits? Or will we have to wait another half year for any news? --- Identity verification is indeed necessary, but this all-in-one design often ends up not doing anything well. --- "Gradually mature" Web3 infrastructure? Feels like we're still in various trial-and-error stages. --- Handling identity, resources, coordination again... feels like building a big, comprehensive system. Can it really be managed?

View OriginalReply0

rug_connoisseur

· 5h ago

What new tricks are we up to this time? From execution layers to identity verification, it sounds like we're aiming to be a jack-of-all-trades. --- Once again, the name change and upgrade—can't we first stabilize the infrastructure? --- I've heard this argument too many times: from single-layer to multi-layer, and in the end, users still get cut off. --- Elastic ecosystem matrix? Basically, it's just about trying to make money across multiple tracks simultaneously. --- Architecture upgrades sound appealing, but can on-chain data really speak for itself? --- The notion that Web3 infrastructure is mature—cut it out. Prove the security first before boasting. --- It's the same old story with identity verification and resource coordination; it feels like it's been beaten to death.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 23h ago

Changing the avatar still really requires doing work; it depends on the subsequent ecosystem development. Changing Chain to Network sounds impressive, but I'm just worried it's just a superficial change. If the underlying architecture truly upgrades, that would be interesting, but right now, who isn't hyping up identity verification and resource coordination? Let's wait and see the real interaction data; don't just keep hyping up concepts all day.

View OriginalReply0

RebaseVictim

· 01-09 04:08

Another rebranding and upgrade. Will it survive the next bear market? --- Identity verification is truly a necessity, but there are too many projects that sound good but lack substance. --- From single-chain to multi-functional networks, it sounds impressive, but implementation is the real challenge. --- Ecosystem matrix, flexible architecture—everyone can talk about these words now. The key is whether TPS and gas fees can really be optimized. --- The name "origins" feels a bit awkward; it seems like just trying to ride the wave of new concepts. --- Multi-party coordination mechanisms sound good, but how many practical scenarios are actually usable?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 01-09 04:06

Another "upgrade," and this time it's double, sounds like it's about to hit the daily limit. From the trading chain to identity verification, just hearing these names makes it feel like the world could change next month. But on the other hand, this routine is getting more and more familiar: first upgrade the concept, then the coin price, and finally upgrade my loss limit.

View OriginalReply0

HodlAndChill

· 01-09 04:03

Another wave of "upgrades." Hopefully this time they won't just follow the trend. --- Identity verification and resource coordination sound good in theory, but what about in practice? --- From single chains to ecosystem matrices, it feels like every project is telling the same story. --- It's good enough if this architectural upgrade can be implemented; don't just talk about pretty words. --- A network of multi-party cooperation, provided that someone actually uses it. --- Another rebranded infrastructure; let's wait and see what the data says.

View OriginalReply0

QuietlyStaking

· 01-09 03:57

Alright, another major upgrade, but how many are actually usable? But the identity verification part is indeed needed, better than the current chaos. There are many projects like this; we'll talk them up once they go live. Just want to know how the performance is and whether there are real application scenarios in the ecosystem. Another story of an ecosystem matrix, I've heard it too many times.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-09 03:42

Double upgrade sounds good, but I wonder how the actual performance is --- Another architecture upgrade. Can you improve the user experience first before boasting --- From the transaction chain to the coordination network, that's a pretty big step --- Eco-matrix and identity verification pitches feel a bit like all projects are copying and pasting --- Origins Network indeed wants to do big things, but the market already has too many promises of "complete systems" --- Flexible coverage sounds appealing, but how many successful implementations will there actually be

View OriginalReply0