2026-01-09 04:21:17

In some crypto project ecosystems, can those community participants who truly invest time and effort receive the recognition they deserve? Or do they ultimately get drowned out by a flood of low-quality content? This is an interesting question. Even more painfully—if actual investments don't genuinely flow into these projects, how can participants' enthusiasm and efforts demonstrate their value? Many projects haven't really thought this through. Project teams need to reflect: how to ensure that the voices of ecosystem contributors are truly heard, rather than becoming noise in a data flood.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FromMinerToFarmer

· 9h ago

Honestly, it's just a vicious cycle... putting in effort but getting no returns. Who would still be willing to continue?

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 01-09 04:51

To be honest, most projects now just treat contributors as tools. If there's no funding flow, who cares about you?

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker

· 01-09 04:51

Exactly right. I've seen too many hardworking people ignored in the end, while those airdrop hunters flood the screens every day.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 01-09 04:50

ngl this hits different when you actually analyze the data... most projects are just running sub-optimal allocation mechanisms tbh. if you look at mempool activity during their "community rewards" periods, it's demonstrably false that contributors actually get prioritized gas-wise. mathematically speaking, their incentive structures are gas inefficient as hell

Reply0

TrustMeBro

· 01-09 04:43

Basically, the project team doesn't take the community seriously at all.

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish