2026-01-09 04:24:03

The upcoming launch of DuskEVM mainnet in January 2025 marks the birth of yet another EVM-compatible chain. But this time is different — it is a key component of the application layer on Dusk Layer1, with the real highlight being enabling developers to build financial applications using the familiar Solidity language while simultaneously ensuring privacy and compliance. All transactions ultimately settle on Dusk's underlying layer, ensuring efficiency without sacrificing security.

Speaking of core innovation, the Hedger module is the ingenious part of this system. Using two major cryptographic tools—zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption—Hedger achieves a seemingly contradictory goal: transaction information remains confidential to on-chain participants but is fully verifiable by regulators. In other words, enterprises can conduct private transactions on-chain while meeting international compliance standards such as those set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). This represents a breakthrough for bringing regulated assets onto the blockchain.

Looking ahead, in 2026, a partnership with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX will launch the DuskTrade platform. This platform plans to move over €300 million worth of tokenized securities—such as bonds and fund shares—onto the blockchain. In the RWA (Real-World Assets) track, this will become a benchmark application case. The privacy and compliance features of DuskEVM are precisely the infrastructure needed for such regulated asset exchanges.

From a system architecture perspective, DuskEVM separates the L1 settlement layer, EVM application layer, and privacy compliance layer through modular design, providing institutional users with a customizable and verifiable blockchain solution. For developers aiming to truly implement compliant financial services in Web3, the arrival of DuskEVM may serve as a bridge over the gap between technology and real-world regulations.

DUSK8,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MemecoinTrader

· 7h ago

ngl the hedger module social engineering angle here is lowkey genius... they're literally selling compliance as a feature to institutions while keeping the privacy narrative alive for degens. sentiment arbitrage at its finest fr

Reply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 18h ago

Wow, zero-knowledge proofs combined with homomorphic encryption—this is really getting innovative. €300 million in tokenized securities? RWA seems to be truly taking off this time. Hedger's design has some real substance; it can meet both privacy and compliance requirements. No one has answered this question correctly before. DuskTrade launching next year... we'll just watch, another promise. The compliance chain has long needed proper development; Dusk has found the right direction. The modular layered approach definitely leaves room for institutional users to imagine. Basically, it's about enabling government agencies to go on-chain and do business. Whether the technology works depends on how relaxed the policies are. Is NPEX in the Netherlands reliable? Or is it just another PPT fundraising show? Can zero-knowledge proofs withstand real-world attacks? That's what I care about. As always, a good architecture doesn't guarantee the ecosystem will succeed.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-09 04:54

Ironically, every time I hear "this time is different," I think of the whitepapers of projects from the last bull market. Data shows that the failure rate of zero-knowledge proofs in actual deployment is much higher than advertised, I'm not joking. 300 million euros sounds like a lot, but the liquidation rate of real-world asset (RWA) projects that have actually been implemented... just Google it yourself and you'll know. Interestingly, privacy and compliance are logically opposed. Now people say they can achieve both—are they really different this time? Let's wait until 2026 and make a bet to see whose judgment is more accurate.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 01-09 04:52

They're all privacy compliance hype, can it really be implemented haha --- The Hedger module is indeed impressive; zero-knowledge proofs finally have a real use case --- Someone has been hyping RWA for a while; let's see if DuskTrade can really bring 300 million euros on-chain --- Another chain is born, another story; let's wait until 2026 to see --- Privacy compatibility and compliance? Sounds like wanting to have your cake and eat it too --- Why go back to Dusk's underlying settlement? Can't we just use L1 directly? --- Is NPEX a legitimate exchange? I suddenly can't grasp the logic of this partnership --- Good news for Solidity developers, but who will pay for the gas fees?

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 01-09 04:52

Privacy + compliance combo is indeed powerful; zero-knowledge proofs + homomorphic encryption directly address regulatory concerns. Honestly, Dusk's approach this time is much more reliable than that bunch of air EVMs. Finally, someone has figured out the RWA stuff. Tokenized securities worth 300 million euros on the chain—if NPEX can really be implemented, that’s true practical application. However, the natural migration path for Solidity users is indeed clever. Will developers really buy into it, or is it just internal hype? Underlying settlement + application layer isolation, the architecture is indeed well thought out, but whether the execution layer can keep up is another matter.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 01-09 04:51

Finally, a serious effort to comply with regulations, but can this set of zero-knowledge proofs really fool regulators in various countries... Meeting both privacy and compliance requirements at the same time? Sounds a bit too good to be true. RWA on the chain worth 300 million euros—if this really gets off the ground, that would be impressive. Let’s wait and see. There are already many Solidity developers, and the idea of lowering the barrier is indeed clever, but I wonder if it can truly attract institutions to use it. Early participants are probably going to make a lot of money, especially if Hedger really proves effective. Modular architecture sounds good, but these days, there are too many projects that sound promising... Official launch in 2026, that’s quite a long timeline. It’s hard to say whether they can stick with it in the meantime. By the way, can this really become a benchmark for RWA? It feels a bit overhyped. Is the Dutch exchange reliable? I haven’t heard much about NPEX.

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 01-09 04:49

Privacy + Compliance combo, finally someone has figured out how to get it right. The Hedger module design is indeed top-notch. The 300 million euro RWA market, we'll see if NPEX can truly land by 2026. Speaking of zero-knowledge proofs, they've been popular again in the past two months, but few projects have actually used them. Is Dusk serious this time? Can Solidity developers jump right in without relearning a new language? That definitely lowers the barrier. The pain point of bringing compliant assets on-chain is indeed here, but the question is whether regulatory authorities will really buy into it... Modular architecture sounds good, but I'm worried it might end up being a big but poorly designed system. I just want to know if the performance will lag after the mainnet launches, and whether the privacy layer will become a bottleneck.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 01-09 04:44

zero-knowledge proofs look clean on paper but... requires extensive third-party auditing before i even glance at it tbh

Reply0