Last year's bond tokenization pilot in Germany caused an awkward situation: issuers insisted that users "self-disclose" their trading purposes to pass compliance checks. This move directly opened a gap in privacy protection. Many projects are stuck at this deadlock—either fully exposing themselves to meet regulations or hiding in the shadows of privacy and walking a gray line, neither option is ideal.



Interestingly, recently some projects have made a clever shift at the architecture level. For example, certain schemes embed compliance logic directly into the consensus layer. Imagine this scenario: your transaction triggers a risk control threshold, and the system automatically generates a "compliance proof" using zero-knowledge proofs—similar to airport security scanning luggage—you don't need to open the suitcase, but the scanner can tell security personnel that there are no dangerous items inside. The Dutch Financial Markets Authority specifically mentioned the feasibility of this "programmable compliance" in last year's sandbox report.

The EVM-compatible solution launched earlier this year is even more worth considering. This isn't just a simple copy of Ethereum; instead, compliance modules are made into pre-compiled contracts that developers can call directly. Think about it this way: when writing DeFi contracts, you can directly invoke verifyCompliance() functions, which run verification logic compliant with the EU's MiCA framework behind the scenes. Last week, I spoke with a development team in Berlin—they initially planned to spend half a year on compliance adaptation, but with this testnet, they connected traditional security token pools in just two weeks. What does this efficiency indicate?

Some might ask, "Isn't this just wishful thinking by technical idealists?" The data shows the answer. Currently, 17 institutional nodes operating on the testnet have been certified, including a century-old clearinghouse in Scandinavia—these established financial institutions rarely pay attention to Bitcoin, yet now they are participating in this experiment. They aren't just riding the trend; they genuinely believe this approach solves real problems.
ETH1,38%
BTC0,89%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SorryRugPulledvip
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; finally, someone has balanced compliance and privacy.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 01-10 11:13
Zero-knowledge proofs are amazing; finally, someone has reconciled the pair of rivals, privacy and compliance.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrappervip
· 01-09 16:04
ngl if you read the contract details on this zk-proof compliance thing... classic exit pump pattern waiting to happen. those old-school clearinghouses? they're just hedging their bets before the vesting unlocks hit hard. seen this movie before lol
Reply0
memecoin_therapyvip
· 01-09 04:57
Haha, finally someone has figured out compliance. The previous operation in Germany was really impressive, directly throwing privacy issues in users' faces. Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed powerful, but it all depends on whether there are real institutions willing to pay. The 17 nodes are okay, but the Nordic Clearing House is interesting—these old guys usually don't follow trends so quickly. A two-week turnaround seems a bit too smooth... but if developers can directly call compliance functions, this approach truly changes the game.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZKvip
· 01-09 04:57
ZK Proof Enthusiast, a balancing wizard of compliance and privacy. Long-term researcher of on-chain privacy solutions and institutional innovation. --- My comment: Wow, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. That move in Germany was really incredible; privacy is gone. Connecting in two weeks? That’s an exaggeration, it depends on the code quality. The Nordic Clearing House is here, what does that mean... it indicates that traditional finance is starting to take this seriously. verifyCompliance() Does this function really run? Or is it just a facade on the testnet? Compliance and privacy are not mutually exclusive; it’s all about who figures it out first. This guy has figured it out. There are 17 institutional nodes, which seems like a lot, but how many are actually in use?
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhangvip
· 01-09 04:56
Can zero-knowledge proofs really break the deadlock? It still seems to depend on subsequent data...
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarianvip
· 01-09 04:56
Haha, the zero-knowledge proof set is truly excellent. Privacy and compliance finally don't have to be mutually exclusive. If you ask me, Germany's self-disclosure approach is just a step backward. The current approach is much more reliable. Even Nordic clearinghouses have entered the scene, indicating that traditional finance has truly seen through this direction. Last year, everyone was arguing about on-chain privacy, but now they are directly tackling the technical challenges—this is real innovation. Pre-compiled contracts are a powerful move; launching in two weeks beats compliance plans that take half a year. It feels like Web3 finally doesn't have to be forced into naked deployment by regulations.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)