The contradiction between privacy and compliance has always been a difficult problem that DeFi cannot avoid. Most solutions are simply balancing the scales between these two ends, often resulting in a situation where you can't have both fish and bear's paw at the same time. But some projects have thought of another way—rather than making trade-offs within the existing framework, why not completely change the game rules.



Dusk Network's approach is worth paying attention to. It introduces a set of cryptographic tools that allow authorized individuals to see only what they must see. It sounds abstract, but the underlying technical logic is actually straightforward. The core is a set called Rusk, a zero-knowledge virtual machine. Imagine it as a completely enclosed computing space. Smart contracts run inside it, with all inputs, logical processes, and data changes encrypted and locked. Outside observers can only see the final result that has been mathematically proven to be "correct."

What does this change? Previously, a compliant DeFi application had to expose sensitive information like user addresses and transaction amounts to auditors. Now, that's no longer necessary. Auditors only need to see a cryptographic proof that simply states "all operations comply with the rules," without revealing any details. It's similar to airport security checks—you don't have to open your luggage and show everything; just pass through an X-ray scanner, and the machine gives a "pass" or "intercept" decision—privacy is fully protected.

But isolated privacy alone isn't very useful. Finance requires liquidity and connectivity. Therefore, in cross-chain interoperability, Dusk has also made careful arrangements. It didn't try to reinvent the wheel from scratch but instead deeply cooperated with the cross-chain protocol of a well-known oracle, using this bridge to connect traditional assets with decentralized ecosystems. This way, privacy protection and real-world applications can truly be integrated.
DUSK3,96%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-11 19:18
Alright, finally someone is seriously addressing this issue. Instead of mutual compromises, it's better to directly change the rules. I like this approach. I'll just comment directly: The zero-knowledge virtual machine sounds really exciting; audit agencies will never be able to peek at my secrets again. How should I put it, if Rusk can really run smoothly, it will give the DeFi community a big shock. But I still have some doubts about cross-chain; deep cooperation always feels like it might leave a loophole. No matter how strong the privacy protections are, exchanges checking addresses will still reveal the truth. By the way, when will this be able to run on the mainnet? I want to see how it performs in real conditions. Finally found a solution to the contradictions, but it still depends on whether the actual implementation can withstand the pressure.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXMvip
· 01-10 19:18
Bro, this zero-knowledge virtual machine is really awesome. Finally, someone has managed to reconcile privacy and compliance, the two arch-enemies. If Rusk's system really works well, I feel like it could outcompete a bunch of projects... But I'm still a bit worried about cross-chain. Are the bridges secure? Are they afraid of another incident?
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapistvip
· 01-10 15:57
Speaking of this zero-knowledge virtual machine, it sounds good, but when it comes to auditing, can the auditing agencies trust these cryptographic proofs? It all depends on how they perceive it.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryvip
· 01-09 19:01
Zero-knowledge proofs sound high-end, but can they really solve practical problems? It still feels like just theory on paper. Wait, cross-chain collaboration is the real focus. What's the use of privacy if liquidity can't keep up? The idea of the Rusk virtual machine is good, but I wonder if the gas fees will be prohibitively expensive. This approach is indeed innovative; finally, someone isn't choosing sides between privacy and compliance. Changing the auditing method—what does that mean? Will regulators accept this... a bit worried. The airport security checkpoint analogy is excellent, simple and easy to understand. It seems Dusk is betting on a shift in regulatory attitude, quite bold.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMinervip
· 01-09 04:56
Zero-knowledge proofs have been around for years, and this time, does Dusk really implement them? --- Basically, the auditor can't see the details, but do we just trust the mathematical proof? What if there's a bug? --- Cross-chain collaboration sounds good, but I don't know how effective it will be in practice. Could it just be hype? --- The airport security analogy is okay, but in DeFi, we're worried about issues without anyone taking responsibility. --- I believe in privacy protection, but the key is whether there are projects in the ecosystem actually using it. --- What are the performance metrics of this Rusk virtual machine? Privacy alone isn't enough; if transaction speed isn't good, it's pointless. --- Instead of balancing, it's better to change the rules. The statements sound impressive; let's see how they are implemented later. --- Will compliance agencies really only look at cryptographic proofs? I remain skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGasvip
· 01-09 04:36
Oh wow, someone is finally taking zero-knowledge proofs seriously; it's no longer just theoretical discussions. I like the idea behind this Rusk virtual machine, but we'll have to see if it can actually be implemented in practice. If cross-chain cooperation really works well, privacy and compliance won't have to be mutually exclusive. But we still need to keep an eye on it; there are too many boastful projects in DeFi. Let's wait until TPS improves before making any judgments.
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartelvip
· 01-09 04:35
Oh, this is the real gameplay. Zero-knowledge proofs are finally being genuinely used. But as for Dusk's cross-chain... can it really be reliable? Rusk sounds good, but will it actually work in practice? That's another story. We've been talking about privacy for years, but whether it can truly be implemented still depends. The compliance auditing part has indeed been streamlined, I have to admit this approach is feasible. But relying on oracles... isn't that just shifting the risk? It feels like someone is finally seriously solving the problem, rather than just talking tough. Those previous solutions were just compromises and trash; this approach is different.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)