2026-01-09 04:30:42

Walrus's goal of making privacy a truly mainstream application, in simple terms, is to change the way the current financial system operates. From a technical foundation, dual-mode trading combined with ZK VM contracts is the core, allowing this setup to handle complex transactions while protecting user privacy.

The ecosystem is also accelerating. The collaboration with NPEX has pushed the on-chain securities process forward quickly, and the Vault and Pay two products have created a full-stack solution. The modular design makes this system flexible enough — it can meet the EU DLT regulatory requirements and also provide a comfortable experience for institutional investors.

From the perspective of $WAL's role, the staking and Hyper intelligent mechanisms are well-designed, and the participation is quite popular. Ultimately, Walrus is building a bridge connecting traditional finance and DeFi, truly integrating privacy, compliance, and usability. For the Web3 ecosystem, this approach is worth paying attention to.

WAL-2,96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEV_Whisperer

· 01-11 22:43

Truth and falsehood intertwined, privacy and compliance both involved, ultimately it's just paving the way to harvest the little guys.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 01-11 12:27

Dual-mode trading with ZK VM sounds impressive, but can it really become popular? Privacy and compliance are inherently conflicting, and Walrus trying to handle both is a bit of a gamble. The NPEX partnership is okay, but with the EU's strict regulations on securities on the blockchain, can it really succeed? How is the staking data for $WAL? Can the popularity be converted into actual applications? Ultimately, it still depends on the market response later on. No matter how good the framework is, if users don't buy in, it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

GweiObserver

· 01-10 19:24

Dual-mode trading with ZK VM, sounds impressive, but how many people can really implement it? Walrus's approach is good, but the key is whether the subsequent ecosystem can truly take off. Compliance is compliance, privacy is privacy, and how to balance them is the real test. The reliability of NPEX will determine how far this story can go. Modular design is well done, at least not as rigid as some other projects. $WAL's staking popularity is quite high, but popularity ≠ real project value; it still depends on the patience of token holders. Basically, they want to be intermediaries between traditional finance and DeFi, and these folks are quite ambitious.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 01-09 05:12

Dual-mode trading combined with ZK VM is indeed a key breakthrough, but whether it can be practically implemented depends on ecosystem participation. --- The full-stack Vault and Pay solution sounds promising, but I'm worried it might just be another illusion. --- Connecting traditional finance and DeFi? Easier said than done with so many pitfalls. It's hard to say if Walrus can navigate through them. --- With $WAL staking so popular, could this be another cycle of hype followed by cooling off? --- Achieving privacy + compliance + usability simultaneously is a significant challenge. --- Modular design to meet DLT regulation is a good approach; we'll see if the EU will truly recognize it.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 01-09 05:00

The ZK VM setup is indeed interesting, but there are few projects that can truly be implemented... Walrus, can you avoid creating PPT tokens this time?

View OriginalReply0

BlindBoxVictim

· 01-09 04:56

Dual-mode trading with ZK VM sounds great, but I wonder if in practice it will be just the same complicated old story. The idea of bridging traditional finance and DeFi has been talked about for years, but few have actually achieved it. NPEX collaboration is okay, but the key is whether it can truly attract ordinary users; otherwise, it might just become a playground for institutional players. The Hyper mechanism looks lively, but what exactly supports the value of $WAL? I still have some doubts about this part. This all-in-one solution sounds like it can do everything, but it makes me wonder if it can do anything well. What do you think? Modularity and flexibility are definitely advantages, but can it truly adapt across different regulatory systems, or will it be easily broken down?

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-09 04:56

Wow, can this ZK VM really work? Privacy compliance and everything else need to be handled, but it all depends on real data.

View OriginalReply0

BoredRiceBall

· 01-09 04:51

Dual-mode trading combined with ZK VM contracts, this is indeed impressive. Basically, it's about tackling the two major challenges of privacy and compliance, but how much can actually be implemented in practice? Modular design is indeed flexible, but it still depends on how the subsequent ecosystem development unfolds. I need to study the WAL token mechanism further; participation in the Staking part is indeed quite good. Connecting traditional finance and DeFi? This idea is quite interesting, but I'm worried it might end up being all talk and no action.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 01-09 04:46

Dual-mode trading paired with ZK VM sounds promising, but let's see if it can really run first. Walrus wants to create a privacy mass application? Just see if anyone actually uses it. On-chain compliance in securities is indeed a breakthrough, but whether institutions will buy in still remains to be seen. If this setup can truly connect traditional finance and DeFi, it’s quite powerful, but be cautious given the many pitfalls in the DeFi space. The hype around $WAL's Hyper mechanism is just hype; I'm worried it might just be another round of rug pulling. It looks quite comprehensive, but no matter how flexible the modular design is, without real-world use cases, it’s just a show.

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 01-09 04:44

Sounds good, but it's surprising if it can actually be implemented.

View OriginalReply0