#密码资产动态追踪 Recent rumors about a certain country hoarding a massive amount of Bitcoin have attracted quite a bit of attention in the community. It is said that through methods such as gold exchange, converting oil revenues into stablecoins, and even seizing local mining farms, an astonishing number has been accumulated. It sounds indeed incredible.
However, from on-chain data, this story doesn't quite hold up. Top industry on-chain analysts have pointed out that if such a large amount of Bitcoin truly existed, it would be nearly impossible for it to completely "disappear" on the blockchain. The publicly verifiable official addresses contain only a little over two hundred BTC, which is far from the rumored amount.
It is worth mentioning that the local population does actively use cryptocurrencies to combat domestic inflation, which is a fact. But regarding the government's mysterious hoarding, the evidence is still quite weak. Whether this is the market's next turning point or just another baseless rumor remains uncertain for now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CoconutWaterBoy
· 15h ago
It's the same trick again. The on-chain data is right there, and the 200+ Bitcoins are way off from the rumors... Clearly fabricated.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-09 09:48
It's the same old trick again. The on-chain data is all there, yet you're still making up stories.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 01-09 05:28
On-chain data never lies, but those official addresses got exposed.
---
It's the same old story, claiming big moves every time, but where's the data? None.
---
The public using crypto to fight inflation is a real thing, but the government just talks nonsense.
---
News is everywhere, but on-chain holdings are just this much, hilarious.
---
Wait, trying to fool us with just over 200 coins? You're overestimating us.
---
I've heard this story too many times, wake up, everyone.
---
Why should we believe? Show on-chain evidence first.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-09 05:27
It's the same story again. On-chain data is right there—can over 200 coins be called accumulation? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 01-09 05:22
It's the same old story... On-chain data doesn't lie. Over 200 coins versus 2 million coins, the gap is right there.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 01-09 05:19
On-chain data quickly exposes the truth; there's really no way to hide it.
---
Another ridiculously fabricated story; anyway, I don't believe it.
---
The public's anti-inflation efforts are real. Government hoarding coins? Ha, where's the evidence?
---
Over two hundred coins compared to the rumored amount... the gap is just too big.
---
It's always the same. First, they hype it up wildly, then check the chain and find nothing.
---
Feels like another round of harvesting naive investors.
---
Official addresses are just this much; everything else is just air.
#密码资产动态追踪 Recent rumors about a certain country hoarding a massive amount of Bitcoin have attracted quite a bit of attention in the community. It is said that through methods such as gold exchange, converting oil revenues into stablecoins, and even seizing local mining farms, an astonishing number has been accumulated. It sounds indeed incredible.
However, from on-chain data, this story doesn't quite hold up. Top industry on-chain analysts have pointed out that if such a large amount of Bitcoin truly existed, it would be nearly impossible for it to completely "disappear" on the blockchain. The publicly verifiable official addresses contain only a little over two hundred BTC, which is far from the rumored amount.
It is worth mentioning that the local population does actively use cryptocurrencies to combat domestic inflation, which is a fact. But regarding the government's mysterious hoarding, the evidence is still quite weak. Whether this is the market's next turning point or just another baseless rumor remains uncertain for now.