After repeatedly encountering pitfalls in several projects, I discovered a pattern: most activities have no transparent reward rules, and participants can never fully understand the logic. This black-box operation method is the easiest way to lose confidence.

A recent project I came across gave me a slightly different impression. Its reward mechanism is fully transparent—allocating 0.2% of the total token supply for activity incentives, clearly divided among the top 300 participants. More specifically, they intentionally reserved an independent 10% share for the Chinese and Korean communities, which shows that the team is genuinely attentive to the needs of users in different regions.

From a funding perspective, there's nothing to criticize either. The development roadmap for 2025 is very detailed, planning to reach milestones like 2500. This level of sincerity in details is more straightforward than any amount of promotion. Rather than saying the project team is doing marketing, it's more about using data and transparency to earn trust.