Recently, the crypto community has been discussing a new project called APEMARS, claiming an ROI of up to 26,500%. Such pre-sale promises definitely catch the eye, but the risks behind them are worth deep consideration.
Let's look at the numbers first. If such a return could truly be achieved, an investment of $10,000 would theoretically turn into $2.65 billion. Does that sound absurd? Actually, it is absurd. Projects that achieve such growth curves are extremely rare in history, with probabilities lower than winning the lottery. The key issue is that these promotions usually come from third-party promoters rather than official endorsements from the project team, which naturally reduces credibility.
Where are the actual risks of new projects? First, code security. Smart contracts that haven't undergone formal audits may have vulnerabilities that could lead to frozen or stolen funds; second, team transparency. If the project team’s identity is unclear, inexperienced, or has a negative history, that’s a big red flag; finally, real application scenarios. The biggest characteristic of air coins is only price speculation without actual functional support.
In practice, when encountering such projects, the first step should be to read the white paper to see if the technical solution is competitive; the second step is to verify the team’s background for blockchain experience; the third step is to test the contract’s functionality to confirm whether the code can run normally. Doing these due diligence steps often helps filter out most risky projects.
From another perspective, stable long-term returns are always more reliable than one-time get-rich-quick opportunities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-40edb63b
· 01-09 05:52
It's the same trick again, 26,500%? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomad
· 01-09 05:48
26500%? Wake up, this smells like a scam.
Same old story, who would believe third-party bragging?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-09 05:37
26,500%? I calculated the gas three times late at night and still couldn't come up with such an outrageous number.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 01-09 05:35
It's the same trick again, 26,500%? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 01-09 05:31
It's the same old trick again, 26,500%? That's hilarious. Third-party promoters always boast like this.
Recently, the crypto community has been discussing a new project called APEMARS, claiming an ROI of up to 26,500%. Such pre-sale promises definitely catch the eye, but the risks behind them are worth deep consideration.
Let's look at the numbers first. If such a return could truly be achieved, an investment of $10,000 would theoretically turn into $2.65 billion. Does that sound absurd? Actually, it is absurd. Projects that achieve such growth curves are extremely rare in history, with probabilities lower than winning the lottery. The key issue is that these promotions usually come from third-party promoters rather than official endorsements from the project team, which naturally reduces credibility.
Where are the actual risks of new projects? First, code security. Smart contracts that haven't undergone formal audits may have vulnerabilities that could lead to frozen or stolen funds; second, team transparency. If the project team’s identity is unclear, inexperienced, or has a negative history, that’s a big red flag; finally, real application scenarios. The biggest characteristic of air coins is only price speculation without actual functional support.
In practice, when encountering such projects, the first step should be to read the white paper to see if the technical solution is competitive; the second step is to verify the team’s background for blockchain experience; the third step is to test the contract’s functionality to confirm whether the code can run normally. Doing these due diligence steps often helps filter out most risky projects.
From another perspective, stable long-term returns are always more reliable than one-time get-rich-quick opportunities.