2026-01-09 05:26:50

Recently, many friends around me have been discussing USD1 investment plans, and some have even suffered losses from pitfalls on small platforms. This is definitely worth a good discussion—why do the experiences and returns vary so much for the same USD1 products?

A friend of mine has been playing with USD1-related strategies on a leading protocol recently, and his explanation is quite interesting. He mentioned that the core advantage is the efficiency of capital utilization. Traditional financial products require your money to be either staked for returns or borrowed for yield, and you can only choose one. But this protocol is different—it involves pledging assets to borrow USD1, which means the pledged assets generate returns, and USD1 investment also yields returns, effectively creating two income streams from one principal. It sounds a bit idealistic, but it indeed changes the gameplay logic.

The product lineup is also worth noting. I looked at their product matrix, which ranges from low-risk, stable options like RWA and PSM, to medium-risk options like liquidity staking, and then to advanced strategies like vaults. It basically covers different risk preferences. Conservative investors have options, and aggressive ones can find suitable products too. This layered approach is quite reasonable, and at least shows thoughtful design in their products.

Regarding security, he mentioned that the platform has passed audits by CertiK, SlowMist, and other reputable firms. These are well-recognized auditors in the industry. However, I suggest everyone maintain the attitude that while audits provide security, they are not foolproof. Managing your own funds wisely is even more important. All investments carry risks, and the key is to understand what you are earning and where the risks lie.

Honestly, the ecosystem for stablecoins like USD1 has become more mature than before. But choosing the right platform and product still depends on your risk tolerance and your actual understanding of the project. Don’t be blinded by high yields, and don’t be scared off by a few pitfalls. Rational evaluation and diversification are the correct approach.

USD10,01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Layer3Dreamer

· 10h ago

theoretically speaking, if we map the dual-yield mechanism here onto a recursive SNARK architecture... the interoperability vector between collateral and lending really does reframe capital efficiency, no cap

Reply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-09 05:56

Two yield lines sound good, but you need to clarify where the interest rate comes from. CertiK audits can't save you from black swan events; I've seen too many. Small platforms only understand true risk management after stepping into the pit. Diversified deployment is indeed the key, but most people can't do it. High returns often hide unseen leverage. The dual yield model sounds attractive, but in reality, it can also run away quickly. That's why top protocols last longer, because they truly have principal backing.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 01-09 05:56

Double profit lines sound really attractive, but have you considered the risks of stacking in this structure? --- Audit firm endorsement ≠ principal insurance; you need to be clear on this point. --- It's the same old RWA and PSM setup. How many products that can actually run are there? --- Diversified deployment is good, but only if you have spare money to tinker with. --- I've seen many pitfalls with small platforms; it's better to stick with reputable top-tier ones. --- The probability of both profit lines exploding at the same time has been underestimated, hasn't it? --- Projects audited by CertiK still have issues; I've grown tired of hearing about this. --- The truth is, everything has risks; don't be fooled by safety talk. --- How exactly is the vault strategy operated? It's hard to understand just by looking on-chain. --- I just want to ask one thing: how exactly does this yield come about?

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-09 05:55

Dual income sounds good, but I still have some questions about this logic.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 01-09 05:49

Double yield lines sound quite tempting, but you still need to clearly see where the risks are The USD1 ecosystem is indeed upgrading, but don't forget the blood and tears lessons from small platforms Audits are just a basic guarantee; your own risk awareness is the final line of defense Two yield lines? You need to understand how this money is making money Playing the top protocols skillfully doesn't mean retail investors can also hold their ground High yield + low risk is an impossible combination RWA, PSM, treasury strategies... product layering is indeed thoughtful, but getting one wrong can be disastrous CertiK audits mean you can sleep soundly? Wake up, your money is your own protection Diversified deployment is wiser than all-in on any single strategy How are friends who have stepped on the pits doing now? Do you still have the courage to continue?

View OriginalReply0

BrokenRugs

· 01-09 05:40

Two yield lines sound amazing, but it depends on who's managing them. Even audited projects can blow up; I don't trust any promises. Friends who have fallen into traps on small platforms, how are you doing now? Diversified deployment sounds easy to say, but how many people can actually do it? Top protocols are not necessarily stable; no matter how good it sounds, it's still gambling.

View OriginalReply0