Recently, an exchange platform launched an interesting Token incentive program. They announced a distribution of 1 billion platform Tokens to the community, while implementing a special mechanism in their popular games—returning 100% of the House Edge revenue to participating users, effectively creating a zero-commission interaction in these games.
This move had an immediate impact. The BC Token market responded accordingly. As of January 9, BC is quoted at $0.01038, with a 24-hour increase of +32.84%, and during trading it even surged to $0.01105. More importantly, on the first day of the event, the price successfully broke through the $0.01 mark—an important psychological threshold for many who follow this Token.
From a mechanism design perspective, the core of this community incentive plan is direct profit sharing. Returning the profits that the exchange would normally earn to a high-participation ecosystem is a strategy that can quickly attract attention in the current competitive platform landscape. The market response in the short term has been very clear—price, trading volume, and popularity have all shown significant increases. Whether this momentum can be sustained will depend on genuine community engagement and ongoing market interest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster
· 01-09 05:55
I've seen this zero-commission trick many times; the key is how long it can last afterward.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 01-09 05:55
This operation, to put it simply, is turning a zero-sum game into a profit-sharing model... It’s somewhat like the guild system of medieval workshops, giving surplus back to participants. The question is, how long can this profit-sharing last? Once the hype fades, what will happen to those who rushed in?
View OriginalReply0
SneakyFlashloan
· 01-09 05:52
Zero commission? I've seen this trick before—spending money to boost popularity. Short-term price pumps are easy for anyone, but the real question is how long can it be sustained...
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 01-09 05:52
The idea of zero commission sounds pretty great, but with 1 billion tokens thrown out, how will it be sustained afterward...
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 01-09 05:45
Zero commission? How crazy does the hype have to be to create this kind of market? That's pretty interesting.
Recently, an exchange platform launched an interesting Token incentive program. They announced a distribution of 1 billion platform Tokens to the community, while implementing a special mechanism in their popular games—returning 100% of the House Edge revenue to participating users, effectively creating a zero-commission interaction in these games.
This move had an immediate impact. The BC Token market responded accordingly. As of January 9, BC is quoted at $0.01038, with a 24-hour increase of +32.84%, and during trading it even surged to $0.01105. More importantly, on the first day of the event, the price successfully broke through the $0.01 mark—an important psychological threshold for many who follow this Token.
From a mechanism design perspective, the core of this community incentive plan is direct profit sharing. Returning the profits that the exchange would normally earn to a high-participation ecosystem is a strategy that can quickly attract attention in the current competitive platform landscape. The market response in the short term has been very clear—price, trading volume, and popularity have all shown significant increases. Whether this momentum can be sustained will depend on genuine community engagement and ongoing market interest.