Recently, many people in the crypto community have been discussing the changes brought about by ecosystem adjustments. A statement from the Zcash Foundation is worth noting. They emphasized a key point: Zcash is essentially a decentralized open-source protocol that cannot be monopolized by any team, contributor, or organization.
Specifically, this design logic—code is fully open source and transparent, allowing anyone to review; consensus rules are enforced by globally distributed independent node operators rather than centralized control; the entire ecosystem is maintained and evolved collaboratively by diverse organizations and developers. This architectural design inherently prevents the concentration of power.
They also mentioned a common point of confusion: when the ecosystem undergoes organizational restructuring, many people tend to conflate this with the health of the network itself. In fact, these should be viewed separately—the changes at the organizational level and the stability of protocol operation are two different things. One pertains to management, the other to technology, and they should not be mixed up.
This clarification is indeed meaningful at present, especially for those concerned about the independence of the protocol. Decentralization is not just a technical feature; it is also a reflection of the overall design philosophy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 01-11 13:50
It's the same old spiel... I'm tired of hearing that organizational adjustments = ecosystem collapse logic.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidation
· 01-10 10:41
Well said, this is what it truly means to understand decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 01-09 05:58
Another declaration of "We are very decentralized." Believe it or not, I'm a bit tired anyway, haha.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 01-09 05:55
Speaking of which, organizational restructuring and protocol independence really shouldn't be confused, and the Zcash Foundation is right about that.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 01-09 05:49
It sounds like they're just defending ZEC; organizational restructuring ≠ protocol collapse. The logic makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 01-09 05:49
They're starting to make excuses again. Separating organizational restructuring from protocol health? Easy to say, but in reality, messing up one can still cause a complete breakdown.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 01-09 05:31
We've heard quite a bit about open-source transparency, but the key still lies in the actual distribution of nodes. Don't just talk about ideal scenarios.
Recently, many people in the crypto community have been discussing the changes brought about by ecosystem adjustments. A statement from the Zcash Foundation is worth noting. They emphasized a key point: Zcash is essentially a decentralized open-source protocol that cannot be monopolized by any team, contributor, or organization.
Specifically, this design logic—code is fully open source and transparent, allowing anyone to review; consensus rules are enforced by globally distributed independent node operators rather than centralized control; the entire ecosystem is maintained and evolved collaboratively by diverse organizations and developers. This architectural design inherently prevents the concentration of power.
They also mentioned a common point of confusion: when the ecosystem undergoes organizational restructuring, many people tend to conflate this with the health of the network itself. In fact, these should be viewed separately—the changes at the organizational level and the stability of protocol operation are two different things. One pertains to management, the other to technology, and they should not be mixed up.
This clarification is indeed meaningful at present, especially for those concerned about the independence of the protocol. Decentralization is not just a technical feature; it is also a reflection of the overall design philosophy.