On January 9th, the Zcash Foundation conveyed its latest stance—regarding the collective resignation of the development team and their plans to establish a new company, the official response was clear.
As a decentralized open-source protocol, Zcash's core positioning determines its resilience. Even if there are changes within any individual contributor, team, or organization, it will not undermine the integrity and continuity of the Zcash blockchain itself. This is a true reflection of decentralized design—the protocol operates independently and does not rely on any single organization or board.
The network continues to run as usual, without question. The Zcash Foundation emphasized its role as the protocol's steward: to continue advancing development, fund independent research projects, strengthen infrastructure decentralization, and maintain transparent communication and collaboration with all ecosystem participants.
In a sense, this organizational change actually validates the robustness of Zcash's design—truly decentralized protocols should be able to withstand shocks from organizational levels.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasBandit
· 20h ago
Even if the team runs away, they can't die. This is true decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 01-11 05:07
That's right, true decentralization should withstand this kind of pressure.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-09 05:59
True decentralization should be like this, with people coming and going, and the protocol still running smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 01-09 05:58
This wave of resignations actually confirms what true decentralization looks like; as long as the protocol is robust enough.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 01-09 05:41
Once again, a perfect example of "people leave, tea cools." The foundation's response is basically saying "we're fine" haha.
The team has left, but the protocol continues to operate as usual—that's what true decentralization looks like.
Just want to ask those developers who have left, how's the new project going?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 01-09 05:39
Alright, the wave of resignations actually proves that decentralization is reliable. I give this logic a score of one.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 01-09 05:29
The wave of resignations has already arrived, and the foundation is still here boasting about decentralization. Impressive.
By the way, can the team really hold up if they all leave?
Zcash's rhetoric sounds like damage control no matter how you listen to it.
Just watch the show; anyway, the protocol can't run away.
On January 9th, the Zcash Foundation conveyed its latest stance—regarding the collective resignation of the development team and their plans to establish a new company, the official response was clear.
As a decentralized open-source protocol, Zcash's core positioning determines its resilience. Even if there are changes within any individual contributor, team, or organization, it will not undermine the integrity and continuity of the Zcash blockchain itself. This is a true reflection of decentralized design—the protocol operates independently and does not rely on any single organization or board.
The network continues to run as usual, without question. The Zcash Foundation emphasized its role as the protocol's steward: to continue advancing development, fund independent research projects, strengthen infrastructure decentralization, and maintain transparent communication and collaboration with all ecosystem participants.
In a sense, this organizational change actually validates the robustness of Zcash's design—truly decentralized protocols should be able to withstand shocks from organizational levels.