2026-01-09 05:29:53

The unlimited issuance rights of the SSV project have always been a hidden danger. If the project team continues to issue tokens frequently, it will only accelerate token depreciation, creating a negative cycle— the lower the token price, the more the project wants to profit from issuance, ultimately destroying itself.

The more core issue is the lack of application. Currently, SSV is just a financial asset with no real ecological use case support. Such tokens are most easily sold off, especially during a downtrend in the price. Instead of blindly issuing more tokens to dilute shares, the project team should focus on building the ecosystem and strengthening the token's practical value.

To put it simply, unchecked issuance is a betrayal of trust. When the token price is already low, it tests market confidence; combined with issuance pressure, participants will only become more disappointed. This is definitely poison for the project's long-term development.

SSV-6,25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerNgmi

· 7h ago

I've seen this endless inflation scheme many times; it's just slow suicide.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber

· 8h ago

The endless inflation scheme is so familiar; it's always the same way to kill a project.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e51e87c7

· 18h ago

It's the same old story of unlimited issuance again, really getting tired of it. The project team hasn't even figured out how to use it.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-09 05:55

The issuance frenzy is unstoppable, truly beyond saving

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 01-09 05:52

Another suicidal issuance, truly incredible.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 01-09 05:42

Unlimited issuance is like slow suicide. Why bother? If the issuance doesn't stop, there's no hope. I'm tired of this trick. Build applications, brother. Don't always think about cutting the leeks. SSV is now just an empty shell. If it has no practical use, who the hell would take over? The coin price plummeting erodes trust, and increased issuance makes it worse... Disappointed. I really don't understand what the project team is thinking—short-term cash-out or what? Application ecosystems are the real way forward. Just increasing issuance is doomed to fail.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 01-09 05:41

Dilution has really been overplayed, it's always the same --- Building an ecosystem is much harder than printing money, too lazy to bother --- Once trust is gone, it’s gone for good. SSV’s situation is a bit risky --- Coins without application scenarios are just financial games; trouble is inevitable --- The project team really thinks they can survive by issuing more tokens? Laughable --- Overdrawing trust is a valid point, but who cares? --- When the coin price drops, the pressure to dilute increases. This vicious cycle cannot be broken

View OriginalReply0

0xLuckbox

· 01-09 05:37

Additional issuance is really the dull knife that kills projects

View OriginalReply0