#美国贸易赤字状况 BTC this wave of market movement, in the short term, still needs to face the $89,000 hurdle. Corrections are normal, but don't be afraid—the institutional investors' cost basis is stuck between $70,000 and $80,000, and the support at this price level is actually quite strong, so the space for a real crash is limited.



Looking further ahead, the market is all eyes on 2026. Why? Because the 2024 halving will make the tightening effect on supply more and more apparent. Plus, if macro policies really loosen and regulatory frameworks become clearer, these are all conditions that add fuel to BTC. In simple terms, we are currently in a phase of accumulating strength.

For short-term traders, wait for clearer rebound signals before taking action. What about long-term investors? These fluctuations are actually a good opportunity to get in.
BTC0,05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 20h ago
tbh the 70-80k institutional floor thesis is cute, but have you actually looked at the order book depth? empirically speaking, that support evaporates faster than people think when real sell pressure hits. technically™ speaking, we're ignoring the whale distribution patterns that suggest otherwise.
Reply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 01-11 15:53
The institution's cost line has always been the bottom line, and there's nothing wrong with that logic. But can the 89,000 level really hold? It feels like we need to take another look.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDivervip
· 01-09 06:27
89,000 is really a hurdle, but I think the institutional support strength is overrated. Wait, will 2026 really be that intense? Can we still speculate so far ahead of the halving effect? Getting in now for short-term trading means risking being cut. I'm optimistic about the long-term, but I'm still on the sidelines about entering now. Whether the 70,000 level breaks or not is the key. We've been talking about supply tightening for so many years, but can this time really be different? Anyway, I won't chase the high. I'll wait for a more comfortable entry point.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollectorvip
· 01-09 06:21
Just hold around 70-80k, institutions won't be that foolish to dump, wait for a rebound signal.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 01-09 06:20
89000 is indeed a tough level, but the institutions' bottom line is there, so it can't fall further. Just stay long-term and relax, after all, 2026 is the real focus.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 01-09 06:06
Is 89,000 really that solid? I doubt it... I'm tired of the institutional cost theories; the key is to see how the macroeconomic situation unfolds. Long-term is long-term, but what if this drop actually hits 70,000? We'll talk about buying opportunities then.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphetvip
· 01-09 06:02
Institutional costs are stuck at 70-80k, this threshold is indeed stable, short-term traders are just panicking and panicking. The long-term is the real way, buying now is no different from free. 89k breaking through would make me eat shoes live on stream. Supply tightening + policy easing, the real show will be in 2026. Down and up, is that all? I've seen even harsher moves before. Friends in the short term should stay calm and wait for signals, don't be fooled by the market. I'm actually looking forward to this wave of correction, keep buying the dip. Institutions are not fools, support levels are right there, what are you panicking about?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)