Investing in a single application project, if you choose incorrectly, it's a pitfall. Investing in a foundational public chain requires hundreds of millions of dollars to play around. Is there a compromise method to use one asset to capture the growth opportunity of the entire Sui ecosystem? Yes, there is—look at the Walrus project.
Walrus is not an independent public chain in essence; it is the infrastructure layer of Sui. This positioning determines its business logic—
Demand side: All the complex DApps, games, and financial applications on Sui are consumers of Walrus. The larger the Sui ecosystem, the greater the market demand for Walrus. These two are interconnected.
Revenue side: Operations such as data storage, retrieval, and processing require consuming or staking WAL tokens to access services. As demand increases, the usage and value of the tokens also rise.
Technical side: Once various applications on Sui deeply depend on Walrus's data layer, replacing it would be very costly. This technical stickiness can form a moat.
Why is this model smarter? Because you don't have to bet on the Sui ecosystem being dominated by a single track—whether it's GameFi, social applications, or DeFi becoming the main focus, it doesn't really matter. You only need to believe in a more fundamental logic: Sui ecosystem growth → data explosion → increased demand for data processing capabilities → rise in Walrus and its token value.
Compare this investment strategy: investing solely in application projects concentrates risk; a single misjudgment can lead to total loss. Investing only in public chain tokens faces a market cap of hundreds of billions of dollars with relatively limited growth potential. Instead, investing in the most certain foundational layer within the ecosystem—the data layer—becomes a more balanced choice. It offers the benefits of risk diversification while directly aligning with the core growth driver of the ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SpeakWithHatOn
· 01-12 06:51
That's true, but does Walrus really have such a strong demand? It also depends on whether Sui can live up to expectations.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 01-12 01:58
The logic of the infrastructure layer really resonated with me. But can Walrus truly create a moat? Over the years, I've seen too many cases where technological stickiness was forcibly broken.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 01-11 15:49
Interesting, the logic of the infrastructure layer is indeed more reliable than betting on a single track. But it depends on whether Walrus can truly become that "indispensable" pipeline.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 01-09 08:03
It sounds like finding a middle ground that "neither bets on a single application nor spends millions on public chains," but to be honest, can this logic really hold up? The data layer moat sounds good, but the key is whether Sui can really grow strong.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-09 08:03
That's correct, the foundational layer is indeed an overlooked gold mine, but the question is, can Walrus really choke the entire Sui ecosystem?
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 01-09 07:59
Hmm, this logic sounds reasonable. Securing infrastructure positions is indeed more stable than investing in a single project.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-09 07:46
This logic is indeed sound; betting on the foundational layer is much more reliable than betting on applications.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-09 07:42
Basically, it's betting on the Sui track, but Walrus's approach is indeed clever. However, it depends on whether the ecosystem can truly explode; otherwise, it might just be another infrastructure air project.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happen
· 01-09 07:40
Oh, this logic sounds like a promotional article for Walrus. Is the problem that a genuine anti-link requirement can definitely boost the UP token value? I just want to know, if the Sui ecosystem really explodes, why not just go all-in on Sui tokens directly?
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-09 07:39
A compromise sounds good, but can Walrus really choke Sui's data bottleneck? It still depends on whether competitors will come in to disrupt later on.
Investing in a single application project, if you choose incorrectly, it's a pitfall. Investing in a foundational public chain requires hundreds of millions of dollars to play around. Is there a compromise method to use one asset to capture the growth opportunity of the entire Sui ecosystem? Yes, there is—look at the Walrus project.
Walrus is not an independent public chain in essence; it is the infrastructure layer of Sui. This positioning determines its business logic—
Demand side: All the complex DApps, games, and financial applications on Sui are consumers of Walrus. The larger the Sui ecosystem, the greater the market demand for Walrus. These two are interconnected.
Revenue side: Operations such as data storage, retrieval, and processing require consuming or staking WAL tokens to access services. As demand increases, the usage and value of the tokens also rise.
Technical side: Once various applications on Sui deeply depend on Walrus's data layer, replacing it would be very costly. This technical stickiness can form a moat.
Why is this model smarter? Because you don't have to bet on the Sui ecosystem being dominated by a single track—whether it's GameFi, social applications, or DeFi becoming the main focus, it doesn't really matter. You only need to believe in a more fundamental logic: Sui ecosystem growth → data explosion → increased demand for data processing capabilities → rise in Walrus and its token value.
Compare this investment strategy: investing solely in application projects concentrates risk; a single misjudgment can lead to total loss. Investing only in public chain tokens faces a market cap of hundreds of billions of dollars with relatively limited growth potential. Instead, investing in the most certain foundational layer within the ecosystem—the data layer—becomes a more balanced choice. It offers the benefits of risk diversification while directly aligning with the core growth driver of the ecosystem.