User onboarding is make-or-break, yet most crypto projects treat it like an obstacle course
Here's what kills retention before it even starts: complex document requirements, convoluted step-by-step processes, and mysterious friction points that derail users mid-flow. It's not intentional, but it's devastating
What stands out about some forward-thinking platforms is their pragmatic approach to this problem. They've realized that respecting user time and simplifying the entry journey isn't just nice-to-have—it's foundational to building sustainable adoption
The difference between a thriving crypto product and one that bleeds users often comes down to this single factor: can you get someone from zero to actually using your service without them hitting a wall?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSherlock
· 01-10 08:43
Really, most projects' onboarding processes seem to intentionally make things difficult for users... I've seen a few platforms with low barriers, and their conversion rates just take off.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 01-09 11:50
Really, most projects deserve to get wrecked just for dying on onboarding. Who's to blame?
---
Honestly, it's because product teams are too lazy to think from the user's perspective, and as a result, users all leave.
---
I've seen too many projects with registration processes so complicated it's ridiculous, and then they wonder why no one uses them.
---
It's just about simplifying the process. If you can't even do that well, you deserve to be eliminated.
---
Onboarding really makes a huge difference. Good platforms are up and running in five minutes, while bad ones make you fill out half a day of forms.
---
Users' time is so precious, yet they still insist on complicated verification processes—it's a tax on intelligence.
---
That's why some projects take off while others die immediately. There's no mystery to it.
---
The experience from zero to one determines everything. It's too late to optimize after that.
---
I've seen too many VC-backed projects throw money and features at the problem, only to die at the most basic entry point—it's ironic.
---
Want to complain but don't know where to start? It's because the process is damn complicated.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 01-09 11:47
They really treat newbies like fools, with a bunch of form files that make it feel like applying for a passport... No wonder everyone has left.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 01-09 11:45
Really, most crypto project onboarding experiences are ridiculous... new users haven't even used it yet and they leave.
---
Frankly, it's because those projects simply don't care about user experience; they make things complicated without realizing it.
---
That's why some projects fail quickly... the entry barrier is too high, who can handle that?
---
Yeah, simplifying the process can really be a lifesaver, but many teams just don't want to do it.
---
The zero-to-one experience determines everything; this is too critical.
---
The most annoying are those that require uploading a bunch of documents after registration... just uninstall.
---
Web3 projects really need to reflect on respecting users' time.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 01-09 11:39
Really, the registration process for most projects is ridiculous. I just uninstalled it.
---
Honestly, projects that do onboarding well have already taken off. Those still tangled up in KYC documents should really reflect.
---
Isn't this the survival rule of Web3? Either simplify the process or wait to die.
---
I just want to ask, who the hell规定s that you have to fill out so many things to join a platform? So annoying.
---
The smoothest onboarding I've seen is just three steps. Everything else is just wasting my time.
---
The core issue is so simple. Why do so many projects still can't figure it out?
---
Users will leave; it's fate.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 01-09 11:35
Really, I've seen so many projects turn away new users during onboarding... a complete mess.
User onboarding is make-or-break, yet most crypto projects treat it like an obstacle course
Here's what kills retention before it even starts: complex document requirements, convoluted step-by-step processes, and mysterious friction points that derail users mid-flow. It's not intentional, but it's devastating
What stands out about some forward-thinking platforms is their pragmatic approach to this problem. They've realized that respecting user time and simplifying the entry journey isn't just nice-to-have—it's foundational to building sustainable adoption
The difference between a thriving crypto product and one that bleeds users often comes down to this single factor: can you get someone from zero to actually using your service without them hitting a wall?