An interesting perspective: blockchain, Web3, and AGI are actually three levels on the same technological evolution path.
First is the foundation of blockchain. It establishes a trusted infrastructure through decentralized consensus and an immutable ledger, allowing data, assets, and rules to be verified. This forms the trust backbone of the entire system.
The next level is Web3. By organizing mechanisms like wallets, tokens, DAOs, and RWA, and starting from the trustworthiness of the underlying blockchain, it builds a truly decentralized digital economy and collaborative system. No longer centralized platform monopolies, but a participatory governance model.
AGI is the brain of this system—the intelligent decision-making engine. It can understand the environment, assess risks, and autonomously execute strategies. The key is that every action of AGI is auditable and constrained on the blockchain, eliminating the possibility of black-box operations. Meanwhile, Web3 provides it with legitimate operational scenarios and incentive mechanisms.
Once these three are integrated, Web3 evolves from mere automation to true intelligent governance, constructing a new digital social architecture that is "supervisable, collaborative, and scalable."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayoffMiner
· 01-10 13:24
Oh no, it's another layered narrative. It sounds beautiful, but can AGI on the chain really be fully constrained?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 01-09 11:49
There's something there, but can AGI really be constrained by on-chain audits? It still feels like an ideal scenario.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-09 11:48
This layered logic is indeed interesting, but when it comes to AGI... can it really be fully constrained by blockchain? It still feels a bit idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 01-09 11:46
That's a good point, but the AGI part still feels too idealistic. Can it truly be constrained?
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 01-09 11:33
Hmm, this logic feels a bit overly optimistic. Is AGI constrained by blockchain? Let's fix the current smart contract vulnerabilities first.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-09 11:25
This sounds good, but can the AGI layer really be constrained by on-chain audits? It still feels too idealistic.
An interesting perspective: blockchain, Web3, and AGI are actually three levels on the same technological evolution path.
First is the foundation of blockchain. It establishes a trusted infrastructure through decentralized consensus and an immutable ledger, allowing data, assets, and rules to be verified. This forms the trust backbone of the entire system.
The next level is Web3. By organizing mechanisms like wallets, tokens, DAOs, and RWA, and starting from the trustworthiness of the underlying blockchain, it builds a truly decentralized digital economy and collaborative system. No longer centralized platform monopolies, but a participatory governance model.
AGI is the brain of this system—the intelligent decision-making engine. It can understand the environment, assess risks, and autonomously execute strategies. The key is that every action of AGI is auditable and constrained on the blockchain, eliminating the possibility of black-box operations. Meanwhile, Web3 provides it with legitimate operational scenarios and incentive mechanisms.
Once these three are integrated, Web3 evolves from mere automation to true intelligent governance, constructing a new digital social architecture that is "supervisable, collaborative, and scalable."