The $DN project team has recently taken two noteworthy actions. First is the contract position splitting operation; from on-chain data, it's unclear whether they actually sold off. Second, they transferred 2M to the Alpha platform. According to the usual pattern, this is often done to pump the price within the platform before selling off. Based on these signals, the holding risk is relatively high. If the project team is truly operating this way, a 40% increase should be considered a good point to take profits—don't expect more. For projects with such high uncertainty, it's better to be cautious.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RooftopReserver
· 01-12 09:06
It's the same trick again, split position + transfer to Alpha? Those who understand know, take profit at 40% and exit.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-12 07:51
Bro, you ran at 40%? That analysis was spot on, I’ve learned a lot.
---
It’s that same trick again, Alpha platform pumps up the price to sell off. Don’t fall for their tricks, DN.
---
Split positions + transfers, I smell something fishy with the project team’s moves.
---
I’m not too confident in on-chain data; it feels like a foggy project again.
---
Taking 40% profit is fine, greed is the problem. This kind of uncertainty is just too disappointing.
---
That 2M transfer on Alpha is indeed a bit suspicious. Maybe we should just stay low and wait for the outcome.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 01-09 12:50
2M transferred into Alpha, I've seen this trick too many times; most likely, it's going to dump.
DN is probably about to run away this time, better to exit quickly at 40%.
The way the contract is divided into positions is so covert, it's obvious they're trying to secretly unload. I advise everyone not to touch it.
The project team’s operation is really unscrupulous; retail investors are always the last to know.
Alpha is starting to cut again; it seems there's no new tricks in the crypto circle.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 01-09 12:50
ngl the 2M alpha move is giving classic pump vibes... seen this exact playbook too many times back in the day
Reply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 01-09 12:50
Another move? Split position + transfer 2M to Alpha... I can guess this routine with my eyes closed.
DN's recent operation definitely feels off, take 40% profit when it's good, don't be greedy.
Contract data is unclear, how can we trust it...
This kind of project is truly Schrödinger's sale, full of uncertainty.
Transferring to the Alpha platform is a classic pump and dump routine.
Take profit first, don't wait until you're bleeding to regret.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 01-09 12:26
Once the contract is split into a small position, I know it's not a good sign. Over at Alpha, it's even more outrageous... I've seen this trick many times. If it hits 40%, run immediately, don't wait for a dump.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 01-09 12:22
You can't see the on-chain data clearly, so how can you confidently determine that it's a dump? The 2M transfer to the Alpha platform itself isn't convincing; it depends on the specific interaction pattern to make an argument. Just selling at 40%? That's too conservative, and this kind of logic is full of flaws.
The $DN project team has recently taken two noteworthy actions. First is the contract position splitting operation; from on-chain data, it's unclear whether they actually sold off. Second, they transferred 2M to the Alpha platform. According to the usual pattern, this is often done to pump the price within the platform before selling off. Based on these signals, the holding risk is relatively high. If the project team is truly operating this way, a 40% increase should be considered a good point to take profits—don't expect more. For projects with such high uncertainty, it's better to be cautious.