Current Ecosystem Status: Why Many Users Are Turning to Mobile Mining
Entering 2025, the enthusiasm for cryptocurrency mining via mobile devices remains strong. This trend has rapidly spread since the end of 2023, driven by three key factors: first, the global proliferation of network coverage and high-performance smartphones makes small-scale participation possible; second, a number of emerging projects (such as Pi Network, Bee Network, Electroneum, etc.) have significantly lowered entry barriers, making zero-cost participation feasible; third, the active Web3 community has fueled enthusiasm for exploring such applications.
For many crypto newcomers, mobile mining offers a “lowest trial-and-error cost” entry route—no need to purchase expensive ASIC chips or GPU mining rigs, just install an app to participate. However, behind this seemingly convenient method lie many details worth in-depth understanding.
What Can Mobile Devices Mine? Mainstream Cryptocurrency Ecosystems
Not all cryptocurrencies are suitable for mining on mobile devices. Currently, the main targets of mobile mining include:
Real Hashpower-Based
Monero(XMR): Uses the RandomX algorithm optimized for CPU, still a “hard currency” for mobile mining. Even mid-range phones can participate, though with minimal returns.
Electroneum(ETN): The first currency designed specifically for mobile ecosystems, with built-in simulated mining mechanisms to reduce hardware burden.
Social Incentive-Based
Pi Network: Over 50 million users, based on daily participation and network growth, not yet listed on main exchanges but with potential value.
Bee Network: Similar to Pi, with a fission growth model emphasizing network effects rather than pure hashpower.
DuinoCoin and other CPU coins: Niche community projects with varying ecosystem activity levels.
Cloud Mining Derivatives
TON(The Open Network): Connected to the Telegram ecosystem, with more mobile users participating in ecosystem staking rather than direct mining.
Important note: Bitcoin and Ethereum, due to their exponentially increasing difficulty, are no longer practically mineable on mobile devices—any related topics are mostly marketing hype.
Operating Mechanism: What Happens Inside the Phone
When a mining app is launched, the device enters a state of sustained high load. The core processes include:
Hashpower Consumption and Device Response
The processor needs to continuously perform complex mathematical calculations to verify blockchain transactions, which directly leads to:
Thermal Management Challenges: Most smartphones use passive cooling (no fans), causing chip temperatures to quickly rise to 60-75°C. In tropical regions or when wrapped in cases, overheating protection may force downclocking or even reboot.
Power Consumption Surge: The battery discharges at 3-5 times the normal rate under high load. Over time, frequent charge-discharge cycles accelerate battery degradation—most users notice a 15%-30% capacity drop within 3-6 months.
System Performance Degradation: When most CPU resources are occupied by mining, response times of other apps slow down, pages load sluggishly, and devices may freeze in severe cases. This is especially noticeable on older or entry-level phones.
Hardware Accelerated Aging: The combined wear of SoC (System on Chip), power management modules, and screens doubles, directly shortening device lifespan.
Two Operating Modes
Local Real Mining (e.g., MinerGate): The phone’s CPU performs actual hash calculations, and rewards are distributed based on contribution after joining a mining pool. This is the most energy-consuming but transparent method.
Simulated or Equity-Based Mining (e.g., Pi Network, Bee Network): Apps distribute tokens based on user activity, network contribution, and other equity metrics, exerting relatively mild hardware pressure but with weaker “mining” sensation.
Cloud Proxy Mining (e.g., StormGain Cloud Miner): Users click once every 4 hours to receive a share of the rewards, with the actual hashpower provided by remote servers rather than the local device—this is the gentlest approach for phones.
Mainstream Tool Ecosystem Comparison
Major market players and their characteristics:
Application Name
Mode
Main Coins
User Experience
Risk Level
MinerGate Mobile
Local mining
Monero, Bytecoin, AEON
Authentic but low yield
Medium
CryptoTab Browser
Browser mining
Token incentives
Convenient but prone to overhype
Medium
Pi Network
Social equity
PI tokens
High engagement but liquidity unverified
High
Bee Network
Social equity
BEE tokens
Easy to start but opaque profit model
High
StormGain Cloud Mining
Cloud proxy
BTC dividends
No hardware stress but high intermediary fees
Medium-High
Actual Earnings and Expectation Management
Based on user feedback data, typical daily income ranges from $0.01 to $0.30, depending on:
Device Performance: Flagship phones with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 or A17 Pro chips can reach 2-3 H/s; entry-level devices only 0.3-0.5 H/s.
Runtime Duration: Continuous 24 hours vs. 8 hours daily, with a 3x difference in earnings.
Project Choice: MinerGate prices based on hashpower; Bee/Pi depend on uncertain token valuation.
Example: Galaxy S22 Ultra on MinerGate produces about 0.0004 XMR daily, roughly $0.08 at current prices; Pi Network users’ monthly rewards depend on network scale and token price, with uncertainties.
Long-term, participating in new projects (like Pi) offers higher potential but with higher liquidity risks; mature systems like MinerGate provide stable but minimal earnings.
Zero-Cost Participation Traps and Opportunities
Most apps claim “no investment needed,” but there are gray areas:
True Zero Cost: Pi Network, Bee Network, StormGain basic versions support free participation, only consuming electricity and time.
Hidden Costs: Many apps induce users to buy “VIP accelerators,” “miner upgrade packs,” etc., promising increased rewards, often based on false promises or pyramid schemes.
Covert Mining Threats: Some malicious apps secretly start mining processes in the background, consuming resources even when the user hasn’t actively initiated mining.
Security Measures and Fraud Detection
In an ecosystem flooded with fake apps, self-protection is crucial:
Source Verification: Only install apps from Google Play or App Store; avoid APK files from third-party markets—this is the most basic safeguard.
Reputation Check: Examine app ratings (be cautious below 4.0), review volume, recent update date, developer history. If an app promises hundreds of dollars monthly but reviews are mixed, it’s likely a scam.
Transparency of Mechanisms: Legitimate apps clearly explain calculation methods, withdrawal rules, minimum thresholds, and fees. Vague descriptions or frequent rule changes are high-risk signals.
Account Security: Enable Two-Factor Authentication(2FA) on linked wallets and exchanges, use strong password managers, and regularly review login history.
Auxiliary Tools: Use VPNs in insecure Wi-Fi environments, install antivirus software (especially on Android), and perform regular threat scans.
Long-Term Damage to Devices
Mining is not only low-yield but also a “bankruptcy” for devices:
Battery Degradation: Capacity can drop 20%-40% within 6 months, significantly reducing daily usage time.
Heat and Noise: Phones run hot constantly, causing discomfort and reduced user experience.
System Lag: Long-term background CPU usage causes app freezes and sluggishness.
Hardware Failures: Overheating can loosen solder joints, damage memory controllers, and cause other hidden faults.
It’s recommended to use old phones or dedicated devices for such experiments, rather than primary devices.
Suitable Users and Decision Recommendations
Recommended for:
Crypto beginners seeking low-risk industry exposure
Owners of idle old phones
Long-term believers in projects like Pi/Bee
Light participants who only click once daily during fragmented time
To be avoided by:
Investors overly focused on short-term gains (very low monthly ROI)
Users relying on main work devices (wear and tear not worth it)
Privacy-sensitive groups
Practical tips:
Prefer long-established apps with reputable developers over new projects
Avoid mining during work/study high-peak hours
Regularly clear background processes and monitor device temperature
Do not spend real money on accelerators even if participating
Follow official updates and beware of sudden rule changes
Another Perspective on Cloud Mining
облачный майнинг на телефоне combines the concept of leasing hashpower with mobile apps, avoiding local hardware stress. Platforms like StormGain allow “one-click” cloud services, with backend servers performing real mining, and users earning BTC dividends. This mode’s advantages are zero hardware damage, but disadvantages are also clear:
Fees and operational costs are embedded in dividend ratios, resulting in lower actual returns than local mining
Platform risks (server failures or scams)
Lower transparency, difficult to verify real hashpower
From the user’s perspective, облачный майнинг is more suitable for those seeking convenience rather than maximum profit.
Overall Evaluation and 2025 Outlook
Mobile mining at this stage is primarily a learning tool rather than a wealth-generating tool.
For newcomers, its value lies in low-risk experience and social participation (especially Pi/Bee network effects); for veterans, ROI alone no longer holds appeal unless optimistic about specific projects’ long-term appreciation.
Key decision factors:
If the phone is idle, trying it out is fine
For long-term mining, consider purchasing inexpensive dedicated devices
Avoid any “accelerator” schemes requiring real money—just skip
Success of projects like Pi depends on future exchange listings and market acceptance; be mentally prepared before participating
The trajectory of this sector in 2025 depends on two variables: whether new projects (especially Pi) can successfully launch and trade, and whether ongoing hardware improvements bring more possibilities. Currently, viewing it as a low-cost ecosystem exploration rather than an immediate financial scheme is more rational.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Truth About Mobile Device Mining: 2025 Gold Rush Guide
Current Ecosystem Status: Why Many Users Are Turning to Mobile Mining
Entering 2025, the enthusiasm for cryptocurrency mining via mobile devices remains strong. This trend has rapidly spread since the end of 2023, driven by three key factors: first, the global proliferation of network coverage and high-performance smartphones makes small-scale participation possible; second, a number of emerging projects (such as Pi Network, Bee Network, Electroneum, etc.) have significantly lowered entry barriers, making zero-cost participation feasible; third, the active Web3 community has fueled enthusiasm for exploring such applications.
For many crypto newcomers, mobile mining offers a “lowest trial-and-error cost” entry route—no need to purchase expensive ASIC chips or GPU mining rigs, just install an app to participate. However, behind this seemingly convenient method lie many details worth in-depth understanding.
What Can Mobile Devices Mine? Mainstream Cryptocurrency Ecosystems
Not all cryptocurrencies are suitable for mining on mobile devices. Currently, the main targets of mobile mining include:
Real Hashpower-Based
Social Incentive-Based
Cloud Mining Derivatives
Important note: Bitcoin and Ethereum, due to their exponentially increasing difficulty, are no longer practically mineable on mobile devices—any related topics are mostly marketing hype.
Operating Mechanism: What Happens Inside the Phone
When a mining app is launched, the device enters a state of sustained high load. The core processes include:
Hashpower Consumption and Device Response
The processor needs to continuously perform complex mathematical calculations to verify blockchain transactions, which directly leads to:
Thermal Management Challenges: Most smartphones use passive cooling (no fans), causing chip temperatures to quickly rise to 60-75°C. In tropical regions or when wrapped in cases, overheating protection may force downclocking or even reboot.
Power Consumption Surge: The battery discharges at 3-5 times the normal rate under high load. Over time, frequent charge-discharge cycles accelerate battery degradation—most users notice a 15%-30% capacity drop within 3-6 months.
System Performance Degradation: When most CPU resources are occupied by mining, response times of other apps slow down, pages load sluggishly, and devices may freeze in severe cases. This is especially noticeable on older or entry-level phones.
Hardware Accelerated Aging: The combined wear of SoC (System on Chip), power management modules, and screens doubles, directly shortening device lifespan.
Two Operating Modes
Local Real Mining (e.g., MinerGate): The phone’s CPU performs actual hash calculations, and rewards are distributed based on contribution after joining a mining pool. This is the most energy-consuming but transparent method.
Simulated or Equity-Based Mining (e.g., Pi Network, Bee Network): Apps distribute tokens based on user activity, network contribution, and other equity metrics, exerting relatively mild hardware pressure but with weaker “mining” sensation.
Cloud Proxy Mining (e.g., StormGain Cloud Miner): Users click once every 4 hours to receive a share of the rewards, with the actual hashpower provided by remote servers rather than the local device—this is the gentlest approach for phones.
Mainstream Tool Ecosystem Comparison
Major market players and their characteristics:
Actual Earnings and Expectation Management
Based on user feedback data, typical daily income ranges from $0.01 to $0.30, depending on:
Example: Galaxy S22 Ultra on MinerGate produces about 0.0004 XMR daily, roughly $0.08 at current prices; Pi Network users’ monthly rewards depend on network scale and token price, with uncertainties.
Long-term, participating in new projects (like Pi) offers higher potential but with higher liquidity risks; mature systems like MinerGate provide stable but minimal earnings.
Zero-Cost Participation Traps and Opportunities
Most apps claim “no investment needed,” but there are gray areas:
True Zero Cost: Pi Network, Bee Network, StormGain basic versions support free participation, only consuming electricity and time.
Hidden Costs: Many apps induce users to buy “VIP accelerators,” “miner upgrade packs,” etc., promising increased rewards, often based on false promises or pyramid schemes.
Covert Mining Threats: Some malicious apps secretly start mining processes in the background, consuming resources even when the user hasn’t actively initiated mining.
Security Measures and Fraud Detection
In an ecosystem flooded with fake apps, self-protection is crucial:
Source Verification: Only install apps from Google Play or App Store; avoid APK files from third-party markets—this is the most basic safeguard.
Reputation Check: Examine app ratings (be cautious below 4.0), review volume, recent update date, developer history. If an app promises hundreds of dollars monthly but reviews are mixed, it’s likely a scam.
Transparency of Mechanisms: Legitimate apps clearly explain calculation methods, withdrawal rules, minimum thresholds, and fees. Vague descriptions or frequent rule changes are high-risk signals.
Account Security: Enable Two-Factor Authentication(2FA) on linked wallets and exchanges, use strong password managers, and regularly review login history.
Auxiliary Tools: Use VPNs in insecure Wi-Fi environments, install antivirus software (especially on Android), and perform regular threat scans.
Long-Term Damage to Devices
Mining is not only low-yield but also a “bankruptcy” for devices:
It’s recommended to use old phones or dedicated devices for such experiments, rather than primary devices.
Suitable Users and Decision Recommendations
Recommended for:
To be avoided by:
Practical tips:
Another Perspective on Cloud Mining
облачный майнинг на телефоне combines the concept of leasing hashpower with mobile apps, avoiding local hardware stress. Platforms like StormGain allow “one-click” cloud services, with backend servers performing real mining, and users earning BTC dividends. This mode’s advantages are zero hardware damage, but disadvantages are also clear:
From the user’s perspective, облачный майнинг is more suitable for those seeking convenience rather than maximum profit.
Overall Evaluation and 2025 Outlook
Mobile mining at this stage is primarily a learning tool rather than a wealth-generating tool.
For newcomers, its value lies in low-risk experience and social participation (especially Pi/Bee network effects); for veterans, ROI alone no longer holds appeal unless optimistic about specific projects’ long-term appreciation.
Key decision factors:
The trajectory of this sector in 2025 depends on two variables: whether new projects (especially Pi) can successfully launch and trade, and whether ongoing hardware improvements bring more possibilities. Currently, viewing it as a low-cost ecosystem exploration rather than an immediate financial scheme is more rational.