Here's the thing – Pump Fun is basically copying Bags' entire playbook when it comes to fee mechanics. Both platforms let you redirect or allocate transaction fees to specific addresses. That's been a red flag for Bags all along, and it's just as problematic for Pump.



The core issue? This setup just encourages deployers to route fees wherever they want. Not exactly a clean model.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-09 22:05
Damn, it's the same old trick of redirecting fees again. Are they just copying each other's homework?
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfervip
· 01-09 22:00
ngl, these two platforms are basically the same, and the fee distribution is really outrageous...
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHuntervip
· 01-09 21:54
The same operation applies; these two platforms feel like there's no real difference. The arbitrary transfer of fees is indeed quite outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruantvip
· 01-09 21:50
Basically, these two platforms are built from the same mold, and their fee mechanisms are just a design full of loopholes...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMomvip
· 01-09 21:44
Basically, it's the same old trick with a new coat of paint. How many times have they played this fee scheme?
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971vip
· 01-09 21:43
ngl, these two platforms are just cut from the same mold, with fees allocated arbitrarily? Trouble is bound to happen sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)