The pain points of the current token distribution mechanism cannot be ignored. Behind-the-scenes decision-making often lacks transparency in price setting, and the allocation mechanism operates as a black box, leading to insufficient liquidity and severe imbalance in incentives. The root of these issues lies in the lack of a market-based pricing mechanism. The continuous clearing auction model offers a new approach — through a dynamic, ongoing auction process, it can ensure the authenticity of price discovery while improving liquidity expectations, aligning participant incentives, and ultimately creating a more transparent and efficient token ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropBlackHole
· 12h ago
The black box pricing thing has been annoying for a long time. Can continuous auctions work with this approach?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-10 16:34
The black-box operation system should have been dismantled long ago. Price transparency is the only way to truly get things going. The auction system sounds good, but can it be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 01-09 22:08
To put it simply, these project teams are still very skilled at playing the game, operating behind closed doors transparently. We retail investors can't see through anything and get cut very badly. The idea of continuous auctions is actually pretty good; at least the prices are genuinely discovered, not arbitrarily set by some people.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-09 21:50
Continuous auctions sound good, but can they truly solve the black box problem in practice? It still depends on how the specific project is implemented.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 01-09 21:48
It's truly a black-box pricing... This chaos should have been regulated long ago. Continuing with the auction approach isn't a bad idea.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 01-09 21:42
It sounds like another set of "this time it will really solve the problem" plans... but can continuous auctions really align incentives? Maybe you're overthinking it.
The pain points of the current token distribution mechanism cannot be ignored. Behind-the-scenes decision-making often lacks transparency in price setting, and the allocation mechanism operates as a black box, leading to insufficient liquidity and severe imbalance in incentives. The root of these issues lies in the lack of a market-based pricing mechanism. The continuous clearing auction model offers a new approach — through a dynamic, ongoing auction process, it can ensure the authenticity of price discovery while improving liquidity expectations, aligning participant incentives, and ultimately creating a more transparent and efficient token ecosystem.