Crypto really that different from traditional finance? Most people would say yes—but that perception gap might be overstated.
Here's the thing: the underlying tech? Totally different. Yet when you strip away the buzzwords, they're running on pretty similar operational logic. Both handle transactions, both manage assets, both deal with risk.
The real issue isn't the tech gap. It's the entry friction. Crypto feels alienating because the terminology is brutal—seed phrases, smart contracts, slippage, gas fees. For someone used to "checking their bank account," this jargon wall feels impossibly high. That's where the actual disconnect lives.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHunter
· 13h ago
It's 3 a.m. again, pondering this issue... To be honest, the terminology system of slippage and gas fees is just a liquidity trap; retail investors simply can't gauge where the depth is.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 01-12 07:23
ngl, the wording really discourages people, making it feel like you're learning rocket science.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 01-09 22:50
NGL, this is exactly what I've been wanting to say. Jargon is really the biggest barrier, more frustrating than technical differences.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartender
· 01-09 22:49
NGL, to be honest, it's just that the terminology scares people away; the technical essence isn't that complicated.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 01-09 22:48
NGL, that wall in the terminology is the real trap... Ordinary people get overwhelmed just hearing about gas fees. Bitcoin isn't that mysterious.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 01-09 22:47
Nah, it's really just a matter of communication skills. The underlying logic is similar; it's just that the terminology scares off beginners.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 01-09 22:45
The NGL terminology barrier is indeed impressive, even more headache-inducing than the technology itself.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 01-09 22:30
To be honest, it's just a high barrier, the technical essence is pretty much the same.
Crypto really that different from traditional finance? Most people would say yes—but that perception gap might be overstated.
Here's the thing: the underlying tech? Totally different. Yet when you strip away the buzzwords, they're running on pretty similar operational logic. Both handle transactions, both manage assets, both deal with risk.
The real issue isn't the tech gap. It's the entry friction. Crypto feels alienating because the terminology is brutal—seed phrases, smart contracts, slippage, gas fees. For someone used to "checking their bank account," this jargon wall feels impossibly high. That's where the actual disconnect lives.