Most of us have accepted the 30% commission from app stores as inevitable. It's just how things work, right? But what if the math could be completely different?
Take a student developer trying to monetize their app today. That 30% cut isn't just a fee—it's a massive tax on innovation itself. It represents the old guard, the gatekeepers deciding what stays and what goes.
Base is starting to shift this equation. By moving to an onchain model, developers capture more of the value they create. No middleman. No arbitrary 30% extracted before users even get their hands on the product. The mechanics change when you remove the traditional intermediaries.
It's not just about keeping more revenue. It's about rethinking who controls the distribution layer. That's where the real disruption happens.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaSunglasses
· 10h ago
It's just a flat 30% cut, what else can we do... On-chain really is interesting; cutting out the middlemen feels great.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibes
· 22h ago
30% that tax is indeed outrageous, but can on-chain really solve it? Or is it just replacing the middleman...
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 01-11 12:25
30% this tax rate is really outrageous. Apple and Google have been leeching for decades, and now it's time for an on-chain revolution.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-09 22:59
The 30% share has long needed to be broken. Apple and Google have been taking too much.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 01-09 22:57
30% is indeed too outrageous, but can onchain really solve it? It still seems to depend on the maturity of the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-09 22:54
Honestly, the 30% figure should have been broken long ago. Apple and Google have had too much of a feast.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 01-09 22:52
ngl 30% this threshold really needs to be broken, on-chain decentralization is the right way forward
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-09 22:47
Honestly, Apple's 30% cut is really outrageous, but can on-chain distribution solve it? It still depends on whether it can truly appeal to ordinary users.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 01-09 22:44
On-chain data shows that the 30% taken by Apple and Google is really an IQ tax. I’ve reviewed the contract code for Base’s logic, and it indeed bypasses intermediaries... It’s worth noting that the transfer of control at the distribution layer is the core, not just a numbers game.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 01-09 22:30
Sounds good, but will Apple and Google sit and wait? That's really naive.
Most of us have accepted the 30% commission from app stores as inevitable. It's just how things work, right? But what if the math could be completely different?
Take a student developer trying to monetize their app today. That 30% cut isn't just a fee—it's a massive tax on innovation itself. It represents the old guard, the gatekeepers deciding what stays and what goes.
Base is starting to shift this equation. By moving to an onchain model, developers capture more of the value they create. No middleman. No arbitrary 30% extracted before users even get their hands on the product. The mechanics change when you remove the traditional intermediaries.
It's not just about keeping more revenue. It's about rethinking who controls the distribution layer. That's where the real disruption happens.