Looking back at historical data reveals an interesting pattern—Bitcoin only truly pulls away from gold during the later stages of the cycle.
This logical sequence is quite fixed: gold moves first. As a traditional safe-haven asset, it always has the sharpest instinct. Once macro risk signals appear, funds start flowing into this millennium-old metal. Then Bitcoin follows, as investors gradually realize the hedging properties of digital assets and begin reallocating.
But the real divergence occurs later—Bitcoin suddenly accelerates, while gold stalls. At this point, the market reaches a consensus that crypto assets are not just risk assets but also inflation hedges, and even a new form of store of value. During this phase, the difference in their gains becomes quite apparent.
Where are we now? Honestly, we are still in the transition from the first to the second stage. Gold has already started rising, but Bitcoin's follow-through isn't strong enough yet, far from the moment of explosive acceleration. If the script of history can still repeat, the second half of the story is just beginning.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 4m ago
This theory sounds good, but I've been through it... The 2017 wave was also described this way, and what was the result? Exit scam, collapse, retail investors getting wiped out. Gold rises, Bitcoin follows, then accelerates? Bro, I've seen too many times where "history repeats" only to turn into "history lessons." Are we still in the first stage? I think, the second half might never come, and instead, it could be the next wave of mining disasters.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 01-10 00:51
Gold is moving, but BTC hasn't risen yet. This is the perfect time to accumulate and wait for the second half to explode.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 01-10 00:47
Still waiting for Bitcoin to take off, while gold has already surged ahead. The same old tricks are still in play.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 01-10 00:42
Gold has already surged so strongly, but Bitcoin is still sleeping? The real show is yet to come.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 01-10 00:37
Gold is rising, but Bitcoin is still dragging its feet. This pace is indeed a bit dull.
Looking back at historical data reveals an interesting pattern—Bitcoin only truly pulls away from gold during the later stages of the cycle.
This logical sequence is quite fixed: gold moves first. As a traditional safe-haven asset, it always has the sharpest instinct. Once macro risk signals appear, funds start flowing into this millennium-old metal. Then Bitcoin follows, as investors gradually realize the hedging properties of digital assets and begin reallocating.
But the real divergence occurs later—Bitcoin suddenly accelerates, while gold stalls. At this point, the market reaches a consensus that crypto assets are not just risk assets but also inflation hedges, and even a new form of store of value. During this phase, the difference in their gains becomes quite apparent.
Where are we now? Honestly, we are still in the transition from the first to the second stage. Gold has already started rising, but Bitcoin's follow-through isn't strong enough yet, far from the moment of explosive acceleration. If the script of history can still repeat, the second half of the story is just beginning.