2026-01-10 04:31:04

This week I discovered something interesting—the countdown to the mainnet of a privacy computing project is gaining popularity in the community. I took a look at their technical documentation and indeed found some ideas.

What attracted me the most is that they didn't choose to directly clone EVM, but instead designed a virtual machine architecture from scratch. It integrates privacy protection and performance optimization, specifically built for complex confidential smart contract scenarios. This approach is completely different from those projects that copy quickly.

On-chain data also speaks—transfers in the past week have suddenly doubled, likely related to the upcoming node election. Some friends with technical backgrounds analyzed with me that after the mainnet officially launches, validator nodes will need to handle zero-knowledge proof computations, which have high thresholds and costs. But conversely, staking yields might surpass the industry average. This high-cost, high-reward design logic is quite clear.

What’s even more promising is the potential for practical application. I personally experienced the privacy voting application on the testnet; the interaction was smooth enough. If the DAO community starts to adopt this privacy governance solution on a large scale, it could truly open up new demand space. Of course, the mainnet just launched, so an adaptation period is inevitable—like all new things, it needs a process of tuning.

The key focus remains on whether real applications can run smoothly. In the privacy track, a truly usable scenario is worth more than ten hyped concepts.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkPrince

· 35m ago

When will the mainnet go live? I can't wait. --- Designing your own VM is really something different, but let's see if it can run first. --- Doubling transaction volume is a good sign, but the key is whether it can stay stable. --- The privacy voting experience is pretty good, right? Then let's wait and see how DAO actually uses it. --- High cost and high reward, I believe in this logic, but I don't know if it can be practically implemented. --- A bunch of conceptual projects are indeed trash, but at least this one has something to look at. --- Does node election require large deposits again? How can ordinary people play? --- The mainnet just launched, so there will definitely be pitfalls. The question is, can the pitfalls be filled?

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlertBot

· 01-11 04:10

Not moving EVM and designing a virtual machine yourself, this guy is serious about it --- Double the transfer? The node election wave definitely has something --- Real applications > concept hype, I agree with this --- The computational cost of zero-knowledge proofs is so high, can node rewards break even --- Is the privacy voting experience acceptable? Will it be disappointing after the mainnet launches --- There are many projects with high-cost designs that ultimately become niche toys --- Are friends' analyses reliable, or are they just making up stories again --- Can this set of privacy governance really run on a large scale in DAO? It's a bit uncertain --- The countdown hot projects, nine out of ten end up with no news --- How long is the mainnet tuning period? That's the real question

View OriginalReply0

ponzi_poet

· 01-10 04:56

Projects that are directly copied without designing your own VM are all scored 0 points.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 01-10 04:54

Not adopting EVM and creating your own wheel, this courage is really big --- The computational cost of zero-knowledge proofs is so high, can the benefits outweigh the costs? --- The privacy voting experience was good, but are there really that many scenarios where it can be used? --- How long will the mainnet adaptation period last, don’t become just another hype again --- High cost and high return sound good, but I’m just worried that the high costs won’t lead to high returns --- Is the doubled transfer volume due to buy orders coming in or liquidity being withdrawn? --- This is true differentiation, much better than a bunch of EVM copy-pasting --- The statement that usable scenarios are more valuable than conceptual ones is not wrong, but the real question is whether it can be practically implemented --- The threshold for node election is so high, will it cause excessive centralization? --- Experiencing privacy voting was good, but can it truly support the long-term development of the ecosystem?

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-10 04:50

Not moving to EVM but designing your own architecture—does this guy really want to get things done or is he just burning money?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 01-10 04:43

Not doing the EVM step is a bold move; projects designing their own virtual machines are indeed rare. --- Doubling the transfer volume has sparked increased enthusiasm for node elections. --- Honestly, if this yield rate can really be achieved, the higher costs are still acceptable. --- Is the privacy voting experience decent? If it can truly be implemented, DAO will change the game. --- To be honest, practical scenarios are a hundred times more valuable than just concepts. --- Solid technical documentation is a different matter, but we still need to wait until the mainnet is truly stable. --- The stack of zero-knowledge proof computational tasks is so large that the threshold for validator nodes is indeed high. --- Few projects in the field can truly run applications; this project has some potential. --- The mainnet's adaptation period is inevitable; the key is whether it can truly attract large-scale DAO adoption. --- Designing a VM from scratch is much better than those projects that just copy and paste.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-10 04:34

Not moving EVM but building your own wheel, this guy is quite something. --- Is the doubling of transfer volume all about bottom fishing? --- I've also tried privacy voting, it’s indeed smooth, but can the mainnet stay stable? --- High cost and high return sound risky, could it be another trap? --- The key is whether there are real application scenarios; just having technical architecture is too superficial. --- Is the threshold for node election really that high? It seems ordinary people might not be able to get on board. --- It's very difficult to produce real innovations in the privacy track; most are just conceptual hype. --- The adjustment period might be more than a month or two; these types of projects often disappear once they fail.

View OriginalReply0