After spending a long time in the circle, many people have become numb to the word "compliance," and even see it as the enemy of "decentralization." Currently, most projects claiming to be RWA follow similar routines—setting up a temporary team on-chain, relying entirely on a single application layer for compliance. Once cross-application interactions are involved, legal risks explode like a thunderclap. However, recently I saw a project deeply integrated with traditional financial institutions, which truly opened the industry's eyes.
The logic behind this cooperation is quite straightforward: the project team partners with a licensed financial institution in Europe, directly bringing real-world financial instruments onto the blockchain. The key is that privacy and compliance are not added later; they are built into the architecture from the very beginning. This is no longer a story of "I have a partner," but rather an endorsement from a complete financial ecosystem.
Specifically, this licensing combination is quite powerful: MTF (Multilateral Trading Facility license), broker license, ECSP (Crypto Asset Service Provider license), plus the ongoing DLT-TSS. These are not just makeshift licenses; they are recognized and solid licenses approved by the EU.
The MTF allows them to operate a proper secondary securities market; the broker license grants access to high-quality assets like money market funds and bonds, ensuring optimal price execution; the ECSP opens up retail funding channels across the entire EU. In other words, this project has taken on some of the most difficult parts of traditional finance all at once.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotline
· 11h ago
The license combination is indeed impressive, but I still want to see the actual implementation results. Shouting slogans loudly doesn't mean you can really move traditional finance onto the chain; there are too many pitfalls here.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 01-10 05:52
Damn, this license combination is really ruthless, directly biting off the threshold of traditional finance completely.
Speaking of which, if this really comes to fruition, those RWA projects that rely on bluffing to make a living will probably have no place to show off.
In my analysis, this is the correct way to achieve compliance, locking risks in a cage from the very beginning, unlike those armchair strategists who analyze after the fact.
Interestingly, the EU actually dares to give crypto projects this kind of combined attack, which feels a bit like a plot twist.
Wow, they directly took down MTF and ECSP, which means they've seized the keys to the retail market.
This time, it's not just a story of "I have a partner," but really has some weight.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 01-10 05:52
Stacking licenses is really impressive, but I still want to see how this thing turns out after half a year. I've heard too many compliance stories.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 01-10 05:48
Damn, this license plate combination is really awesome, but it's hard to say how long it will last.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-10 05:47
Really, after getting tired of those surface-level compliant RWA projects, finally someone is playing for real. The EU's licensing combination is indeed tough.
Incorporating compliance into the architecture rather than patching it afterward is already half the victory.
Wait, how is the progress on DLT-TSS? That’s the real key to implementation.
To be honest, endorsement from traditional financial institutions has indeed changed the game, but what about the risks? Regulatory faces can change suddenly.
The industry has been waiting for projects like this for years; finally, there's no need to constantly worry about the conflict between decentralization and compliance.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 01-10 05:45
This is the real gameplay, not those self-deceiving RWA scams.
Really, the EU license combination is just different, directly bypassing those pseudo-compliance pitfalls.
Compliance built into the architecture from the start? I like this logic, finally someone is serious.
Stacking licenses is not wrong, but being able to implement them is the real skill. Let's wait and see.
Decentralization and compliance are not inherently contradictory; it's just that most projects are too weak.
This move is really aggressive, directly biting into the bones of traditional finance. Impressive.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 01-10 05:24
The license combination is indeed tough, but I'm afraid that in the end, it will still become an agent of traditional finance, and the flavor of Web3 will be completely lost.
After spending a long time in the circle, many people have become numb to the word "compliance," and even see it as the enemy of "decentralization." Currently, most projects claiming to be RWA follow similar routines—setting up a temporary team on-chain, relying entirely on a single application layer for compliance. Once cross-application interactions are involved, legal risks explode like a thunderclap. However, recently I saw a project deeply integrated with traditional financial institutions, which truly opened the industry's eyes.
The logic behind this cooperation is quite straightforward: the project team partners with a licensed financial institution in Europe, directly bringing real-world financial instruments onto the blockchain. The key is that privacy and compliance are not added later; they are built into the architecture from the very beginning. This is no longer a story of "I have a partner," but rather an endorsement from a complete financial ecosystem.
Specifically, this licensing combination is quite powerful: MTF (Multilateral Trading Facility license), broker license, ECSP (Crypto Asset Service Provider license), plus the ongoing DLT-TSS. These are not just makeshift licenses; they are recognized and solid licenses approved by the EU.
The MTF allows them to operate a proper secondary securities market; the broker license grants access to high-quality assets like money market funds and bonds, ensuring optimal price execution; the ECSP opens up retail funding channels across the entire EU. In other words, this project has taken on some of the most difficult parts of traditional finance all at once.