As someone building from the ground up, I'll admit my own bias here, but there's real truth to Carlyle's thinking about exceptional individuals—though I'd say it's incomplete. The pattern holds: in early-stage systems, broken institutions, or crisis moments, individual judgment and action move mountains. But it's not black and white. The structural framework constrains what's possible; people then decide which paths to take, sometimes even reshaping the boundaries themselves. Systems create the playing field; leaders author how the game unfolds.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractExplorer
· 12h ago
The relationship between the ngl system and individuals is like this: during a crisis, individuals can indeed turn things around, but without a good framework, it's all pointless. This argument is quite balanced.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-12 03:40
The institutional framework is the card table, and geniuses are just the players—both are necessary.
View OriginalReply0
NFTregretter
· 01-10 18:25
Matters of the system and individuals... Well said, but the real situation might be more complicated
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinTherapist
· 01-10 06:00
Lol, it's another "Great Man Theory," but he's also right—only when the system is broken to the point that individuals have a chance to stand out does this logic make sense.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 01-10 05:51
This logic has some merit, but it still feels like it's just whitewashing individual heroism... the system is the fundamental part.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 01-10 05:38
Who is more important, the system or the individual? Actually, they both need to work together; otherwise, it's just nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapist
· 01-10 05:33
Honestly, no matter how strong an individual's abilities are, the system has to give you a stage... But during a crisis, it's indeed an exception; at that moment, top talents can hold up half the sky.
As someone building from the ground up, I'll admit my own bias here, but there's real truth to Carlyle's thinking about exceptional individuals—though I'd say it's incomplete. The pattern holds: in early-stage systems, broken institutions, or crisis moments, individual judgment and action move mountains. But it's not black and white. The structural framework constrains what's possible; people then decide which paths to take, sometimes even reshaping the boundaries themselves. Systems create the playing field; leaders author how the game unfolds.