Recently, I observed an interesting phenomenon: an app called Tusky announced it would shut down. I initially thought it would trigger a "digital firestorm," but user reactions were unexpected—they realized their data had actually been securely stored elsewhere all along.



The story behind this involves an increasingly important player in the Web3 ecosystem: the Walrus protocol.

**Pain Points of Traditional Models**

Our familiar cloud storage typically works like this: you upload photos and files using an app, and all data resides on the company's servers. If the company suddenly shuts down, the servers fail, or the service is discontinued after an acquisition, your data faces risk. This "front-end and back-end" model seems convenient but essentially puts all eggs in one basket.

**Walrus's Distributed Approach**

Walrus protocol does something entirely different. It is fundamentally a distributed, highly redundant storage network. Your data isn't held by a single company; instead, it is split and stored across multiple nodes in the network. Taking Tusky as an example, the app itself is just a sleek "front"—providing user interface, management features, and search capabilities. But the real database? That’s stored elsewhere.

**What Tusky's Event Tells Us**

After Tusky shut down, the content users uploaded previously didn't disappear. That’s because those files had already been stored via Walrus in the distributed network. The app is gone, but data access rights remain with the users. This marks a key shift—from "relying on the platform's survival" to "data lifecycle being independent."

Comparing this to traditional cloud drives: once they shut down, the data is usually lost (unless you’ve downloaded backups in advance). But applications based on protocols like Walrus—being distributed—are only affected at the front-end level; the data itself still exists in the network.

**Why Is This Important**

From a user perspective, this addresses a deep trust issue. You no longer need to believe that a company will always exist and protect your data forever. The redundancy and availability of data are guaranteed by the network’s structure itself, not by a centralized entity.

From a developer’s perspective, this also changes how applications are built. Developers can focus on user experience and feature innovation without investing heavily in data center operations. Apps can be more lightweight, easier to launch, and simpler to iterate or shut down—because data security is no longer tied to the application's lifecycle.

**Practical Significance**

Protocols like Walrus represent an important direction for Web3 storage: leveraging cryptography and distributed consensus to truly return data ownership to users. It’s not about "I allow you to store," but "I own this data and choose how to store it."

Tusky’s shutdown could have been a tragedy, but thanks to Walrus, it became a case study—proving that distributed storage is not just a technical concept but a feasible, effective solution in real-world scenarios.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicatorvip
· 13h ago
Finally, someone has clarified this matter. Walrus really changes the game. Distributed storage should have been popular long ago; the centralized approach will eventually cause problems. Hey, wait, can data really be stored permanently? What if all the nodes go down? This is what Web3 should be doing—solving real problems instead of just speculating on coins. In fact, Tusky has become the best demonstration case. Thinking back to how many cloud storage data I lost before, it would have been great if Walrus had been available. Having data truly belong to oneself feels different.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 01-11 01:11
This is true data autonomy, no longer controlled by the platform. Now I understand why decentralized storage is the future—data never loses connection. Walrus sounds quite different from traditional cloud drives. The key is that it really works, not just theoretical talk. It's basically giving the keys back to the users, and that feels much better. When the platform dies, the data lives on; thinking about it the other way around is crazy. Finally, someone has figured out the storage problem. But won't the costs of distributed storage be more expensive? This is what true Web3 should be doing.
View OriginalReply0
NFTregrettervip
· 01-10 06:00
This is true ownership, not just on paper.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatchervip
· 01-10 05:50
Oh, this is what true Web3 should look like—data truly belongs to you.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidatorvip
· 01-10 05:47
Having multiple data nodes for backup sounds good, but from a risk control perspective, the node failure rate and network partition risks haven't been taken into account... Is distributed always safe?
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybevip
· 01-10 05:46
This is true user-owned data; traditional cloud storage should have died long ago. --- Walrus really is impressive; finally, an application dares to play like this. --- Wait, is the data really that secure? Or is it just another hype concept? --- Looks good, but unfortunately most people are still bound by centralization. --- Awesome, finally seeing Web3 solving real problems. --- That's what they say, but how many applications have actually migrated over? --- This is the correct way to approach distributed systems—stop just shouting slogans. --- I'm a bit interested in trying it out, but the user experience probably still needs to be questioned.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)