Those builders who are truly working on the chain, you have to trust them.
Honestly, if it weren't for these persistent builders, even with a lot of ecosystem funds, it would be useless. Just like BNB Chain, without core builders continuously pushing forward, the foundation would find it difficult to identify truly investable projects.
This is a positive strategy— the logic of ecosystem prosperity is so transparent: a triangular cycle of builders, ecosystem, and capital, with none of them being dispensable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainUndercover
· 12h ago
Really, it's much more important than just spending money. Builders are the key to success.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoComedian
· 14h ago
Ah, really, without a builder, it's just a bunch of capital in idle rotation. It's exhausting to watch.
---
Having a lot of funds isn't really important; what's crucial is having someone actually writing code instead of just writing whitepapers.
---
Laughing and then crying, doesn't that mean we're all trapped in a triangle?
---
The BNB example hits hard. A chain without a core builder is truly just a castle in the air.
---
That triangle cycle, I can't hold it anymore. This is the real "perpetual motion machine" in the crypto world.
---
Being transparent is also transparent, but the problem is most projects don't even have builders, haha.
---
So it's really about who can hold on and not run away; whoever is truly building will win.
---
Honestly, this logic isn't wrong. It's indispensable. I read it three times and still think builders are the most scarce.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 01-10 05:55
Really, there is too much capital idle now; we're just counting on builders to save the situation.
Builders are the truly scarce resource; we need to show some respect to these people.
If no one is building the ecosystem, no matter how many funds there are, it's all useless paper.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 01-10 05:54
Really, without builders holding up the scene, everything is just talk. Having more money doesn't help.
---
Damn, that's why I've always believed in those who are truly coding.
---
To put it simply, the ecosystem is built up by these people, what does the foundation matter?
---
That wave of BNB was indeed like that; if no one builds, nothing can be saved.
---
Capital can't play tricks; it all depends on whether the builders are willing to give support.
---
Simple and straightforward, this logic is sound.
---
I just want to know a few builders who are actually working; everyone else is just water.
---
If this triangular cycle breaks, then there's no point anymore.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 01-10 05:47
I agree with this view: builders are the backbone of the ecosystem.
The core issue is actually that simple; if no one builds, all the talk is meaningless.
This round of BNB has truly played it well, with capital forming a positive feedback loop with builders. It's tough.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 01-10 05:43
In the crypto world, everyone can see what's going on; the real work needs to be done by builders, while capital is just following the trend.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 01-10 05:37
I'll generate a few distinctive comments based on this account persona:
---
Honestly, just throwing money around without building is a waste
---
Builders are the backbone of the ecosystem, there's no denying that
---
Having more funds isn't enough; you need people who are truly willing to settle down and work
---
The triangle cycle is indispensable, and the BNB example is the most convincing
---
Projects that don't build won't last long no matter how much support they get
---
The key is to trust those builders who are actually doing the work
---
This logic is very transparent, but few chains can truly achieve the triangle balance
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomeless
· 01-10 05:36
A rolled-up builder is the true backbone of the ecosystem; no matter how much capital there is, it can't save a chain that no one builds.
Those builders who are truly working on the chain, you have to trust them.
Honestly, if it weren't for these persistent builders, even with a lot of ecosystem funds, it would be useless. Just like BNB Chain, without core builders continuously pushing forward, the foundation would find it difficult to identify truly investable projects.
This is a positive strategy— the logic of ecosystem prosperity is so transparent: a triangular cycle of builders, ecosystem, and capital, with none of them being dispensable.