Someone asked me, what exactly does the ListaDAO protocol rely on to make money? In simple terms, it’s a sophisticated arbitrage mechanism.
**The core logic is straightforward: low-cost acquisition → efficient conversion → profit from price differences**
First, look at the acquisition side. Users stake BNB into the protocol in exchange for slisBNB interest-bearing certificates. These certificates directly enter the lending pool as collateral and can be exchanged for USD1 stablecoins. The key point is that the interest rate is extremely low—only 0.41% at minimum. See, the protocol actively lowers costs to attract users to borrow USD1, with a clear goal: to encourage capital outflow.
Where do these USD1 go? Most are directed into the wealth management pools of leading platforms, claiming an annualized yield of up to 20%. The protocol itself doesn’t generate this excess return but acts as a precise allocator. Borrowers pay 0.41% interest in ListaDAO and then earn 20% in external markets, with the 19.59% difference representing the arbitrage profit.
**Security design is thorough**
The system integrates multiple data sources such as Chainlink and major exchange oracles to verify asset prices, with a 24-hour monitoring mechanism for real-time updates. More importantly, the collateralization ratio (LLTV) reserves a sufficiently large safety buffer—preventing liquidation from small fluctuations. This shows the protocol has put real effort into risk management.
**The incentive system is clever**
The governance token $LISTA can be locked as veLISTA, which automatically yields about 38.45% annualized return weekly. This design is interesting—it aligns the interests of protocol maintainers and active participants, creating positive feedback.
**Where are the risks?**
Essentially, this is still arbitrage. Risks come from two dimensions: first, the efficiency of external market conversions might decline (for example, wealth management yields dropping from 20% to 10%), and second, liquidation could be triggered during cross-chain transfers or large price swings. So, it’s not magic or a scam—it’s about capturing the spread between two markets through liquidity, technology, and security design.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Someone asked me, what exactly does the ListaDAO protocol rely on to make money? In simple terms, it’s a sophisticated arbitrage mechanism.
**The core logic is straightforward: low-cost acquisition → efficient conversion → profit from price differences**
First, look at the acquisition side. Users stake BNB into the protocol in exchange for slisBNB interest-bearing certificates. These certificates directly enter the lending pool as collateral and can be exchanged for USD1 stablecoins. The key point is that the interest rate is extremely low—only 0.41% at minimum. See, the protocol actively lowers costs to attract users to borrow USD1, with a clear goal: to encourage capital outflow.
Where do these USD1 go? Most are directed into the wealth management pools of leading platforms, claiming an annualized yield of up to 20%. The protocol itself doesn’t generate this excess return but acts as a precise allocator. Borrowers pay 0.41% interest in ListaDAO and then earn 20% in external markets, with the 19.59% difference representing the arbitrage profit.
**Security design is thorough**
The system integrates multiple data sources such as Chainlink and major exchange oracles to verify asset prices, with a 24-hour monitoring mechanism for real-time updates. More importantly, the collateralization ratio (LLTV) reserves a sufficiently large safety buffer—preventing liquidation from small fluctuations. This shows the protocol has put real effort into risk management.
**The incentive system is clever**
The governance token $LISTA can be locked as veLISTA, which automatically yields about 38.45% annualized return weekly. This design is interesting—it aligns the interests of protocol maintainers and active participants, creating positive feedback.
**Where are the risks?**
Essentially, this is still arbitrage. Risks come from two dimensions: first, the efficiency of external market conversions might decline (for example, wealth management yields dropping from 20% to 10%), and second, liquidation could be triggered during cross-chain transfers or large price swings. So, it’s not magic or a scam—it’s about capturing the spread between two markets through liquidity, technology, and security design.