2026-01-10 06:22:30

ZAMA has also added KYC verification requirements, not only on the registration page but also for subsequent operations. However, there are indeed many issues with KYC approval now—many users report that failing verification completely stalls their progress, with no opportunity to reapply. This situation is quite troublesome; for now, let's see if there are more stable channels to experience.

By the way, recently a new interesting project has emerged in the Web3 gaming field—Anichess, which is also one of the more outstanding players in the gaming ecosystem. The project itself has a good idea and is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

degenonymous

· 8h ago

KYC card basically dies after one attempt, this thing is really speechless... Has anyone tried other platforms? I checked out Anichess, it’s quite interesting, but gaming projects are so competitive that you need to be cautious. Another one adding KYC, when will this madness end... Web3 gaming projects are coming again? Let’s see what pitfalls others have encountered first. Failing KYC results in a permanent ban, the operational logic is really terrible... Anichess’s idea is pretty good, but I don’t know if it can really withstand the pressure, the gaming track is so competitive. Who designed this authentication system? No second chances after one failure, it’s really annoying.

View OriginalReply0

TrustMeBro

· 01-10 06:41

KYC once or twice I could tolerate, but now every platform has to do it again, so annoying --- Permanent lock after failed verification? Can this design be any worse --- Anichess? In the gaming track, these days they dare to jump on any trend --- ZAMA's recent moves are really a bit outrageous, user experience has dropped sharply --- Wait, is Anichess worth paying attention to? I haven't heard of it, has anyone played it? --- Repeatedly messing with KYC really discourages people from continuing --- There are many standout players in the gaming ecosystem, but few are truly playable --- Another KYC trap, there are just too many --- Anichess has a good idea but is the project team really reliable? That's the real issue --- Repeated verification failures with zero retries, how disrespectful to users is that

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-10 06:38

KYC card has been unlinked, this kind of user experience is indeed disappointing. In previous years, I have seen many platforms lose hash power contributors due to this issue, and ROI drops directly. It's better to switch to a more transparent review process to avoid being locked out. As for Anichess, I have always been cautious about the combination of gaming and blockchain. Let's see if its economic model design can support subsequent revenue stability. The key still comes down to whether the issue of KYC failure and such bottlenecks can be fixed, as it directly affects user retention. These projects are innovative, but based on the on-chain data I’ve been monitoring over the past three months, truly stable gaming projects that produce blocks are still few. Some friends have been stuck with ZAMA for two weeks, and in the end, they had to find a new mining pool. The time cost makes it not worth gambling on this.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 01-10 06:38

KYC review failure causes a deadlock, this process is really outrageous. Anichess is quite good, at least the game performance makes sense.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 01-10 06:31

The KYC process is getting more and more ridiculous, failing once and being permanently stuck? That’s really a trap. I’ve heard of Anichess a few times; it definitely feels a bit different among gaming projects. ZAMA’s recent move was a bit excessive; the review mechanism needs to be improved. Web3 gaming still requires more attention; don’t put all your eggs in one platform. The bug where KYC verification failure cannot be retried needs to be fixed, it’s just too unreasonable. The design concept of the Anichess project is quite innovative; the gaming sector is regaining its vitality. Balancing privacy and compliance is really difficult; ZAMA’s recent handling wasn’t very good. The gaming ecosystem is worth continuous observation; Anichess is a pretty good entry point.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-0717ab66

· 01-10 06:30

KYC is causing trouble again, this time with one card per approval, really impressive I'm actually a bit interested in Anichess, the gaming aspect is worth trying ZAMA is a bit behind this time, failed verification and can't retry, the user is directly stuck Web3 games have been a bit lively recently, Anichess indeed looks pretty good KYC review is truly a pain point, once stuck there's nothing you can do, I've experienced it too The gaming ecosystem is now blooming with all kinds of projects, the name Anichess is quite interesting Failed verification cannot be retried, this rule design is really frustrating

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-10 06:23

KYC once not enough, do I need to do it twice? I was thinking these platforms also got stuck during the review process, why haven't they learned their lesson? It's really outrageous to lock accounts immediately after a failed verification. Isn't this forcing people to go elsewhere? Are you all playing Anichess? I haven't tried it yet.

View OriginalReply0