2026-01-10 06:22:47

On-chain transactions, most people fear two things: security and privacy. DUSK has made a good exploration based on zero-knowledge proof technology — transactions can remain private while still being auditable and verifiable, lowering the barrier for users to enter DeFi.

DUSK itself is not just an ecosystem token but also carries the function of network governance. This means token holders can participate in ecosystem decisions and also help ensure the stability and reliability of on-chain services. In other words, it maintains the normal operation of the entire ecosystem and makes everyday DeFi operations more solid. For ordinary users, this design approach is quite practical.

DUSK16,34%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 10h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed an interesting approach; it's not easy to achieve both privacy and auditability at the same time. I'm still optimistic about DUSK's governance token design; at least it's not just hype. Lowering the barrier to entry in DeFi is the real key, so the general public can participate. This ecosystem's stability considerations are quite thoughtful, much more reliable than those purely speculative projects. Audit verification combined with privacy protection? This setup is quite sophisticated.

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 01-11 13:23

zkp this set of tools sounds good, but will it turn out to be another story when actually used? --- Balancing privacy and auditability is indeed a problem; dusk's approach is quite reasonable. --- Governance tokens are everywhere; the key is whether the subsequent operations will turn into big players cutting the leeks. --- Lower the barrier? First, someone has to use it; ecosystem development is the real tough part. --- This kind of logic that is both private and auditable is theoretically perfect, but how difficult is it to implement in practice? --- Token governance + transaction privacy, the idea is quite solid; it all depends on whether the team is reliable. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive, but who among ordinary people can truly understand the technology behind them?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainArchaeologist

· 01-10 06:50

Zero-knowledge proofs should have been popularized long ago, combining privacy and auditing—it's not a scam scheme. The governance token design of DUSK is decent; at least it's not just a pure air coin to scam retail investors. Ordinary people are afraid of being targeted when entering DeFi; more of this kind of privacy infrastructure is needed.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-10 06:50

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed powerful; combining privacy and auditability is definitely a viable approach. DUSK's governance token design is decent, but honestly, how much participation can the average person really have... It seems every project is competing in the privacy chain space; it all depends on who can truly implement it. The barrier to entry is genuinely low, but I'm just worried it might turn into another new scheme to trap retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 01-10 06:47

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly brilliant, combining privacy and verifiability—this is what DeFi should look like. However, the DUSK token can bind governance and ecology together, which is really something... Holding tokens grants voting rights, which is much better than just a plain shitcoin. Privacy + governance working hand in hand, sounds like laying the groundwork for an ecosystem. This is what I want to see, not projects that just shout slogans.

View OriginalReply0

down_only_larry

· 01-10 06:35

Zero-knowledge proofs sound great in theory, but how do they work in practice? Privacy is privacy, but the auditability part feels a bit contradictory... The design of the DUSK governance token—isn't that just standard configuration? Who doesn't have that... How many projects can truly be implemented? Let's wait and see first. Privacy and auditability at the same time? That's an interesting idea, but it really depends on actual performance.

View OriginalReply0

UnruggableChad

· 01-10 06:31

Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but DUSK's logic is truly exceptional. Privacy + auditing, achieving both at the same time. I've always felt that most projects in the governance token space are just slacking off, at least DUSK hasn't completely become an air token. DeFi has a high barrier to entry; any reduction is a good thing. If this model can really be implemented, it would be amazing, but for now, it's still cautious optimism. Can it both preserve privacy and enable verification? That's something. Token holders participating in decision-making... the key question is whether they truly have a say or if it's just for show. To put it nicely, it's about making you feel secure in trading; ultimately, it's a matter of trust. After all these years of hype around zero-knowledge technology, we're finally seeing practical applications. Using tokens for governance is indeed more reliable than pure speculative tokens.

View OriginalReply0