MemeMax has introduced new ideas in the community space, and recently everyone following it can feel the buzz. Opening packs, climbing the leaderboard, collecting MP, participating in the buyback mechanism—these are not just for show; users are actively involved in calculations and weighing costs and benefits.
Especially during the pre-release phase, every transaction fee flows into the $M buyback pool. This design truly taps into participants' psychology. It allows users to experience the project's operation while seeing real-time fund flows and value support. The feeling of "interacting while enjoying the buyback" indeed makes people deeply engaged.
In terms of community enthusiasm and user stickiness, MemeMax tightly combines incentive mechanisms with a sense of participation, which is no wonder it has recently become a focal point of attention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApyWhisperer
· 20h ago
Wow, this buyback pool design is really awesome, with fees directly flowing back, it feels like we're mining for profits.
Wait, can the pre-release phase truly support the floor, or is it mostly hype?
Are those people chasing the rankings really making money or just bagholders? I can't quite see through it.
How long can this wave of community enthusiasm last? Hopefully it doesn't fade away like a flash in the pan.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 01-11 23:30
The buyback pool design is indeed a bit brilliant, making it hard to stop
---
Wait, all the fees go into the buyback pool? I need to think about this logic
---
Damn, MemeMax's community operation this time is pretty impressive
---
Play and earn, no wonder so many people are getting into it
---
MP collection + buyback mechanism really hits the sense of participation
---
The pre-release stage is the easiest time to get cut, be careful everyone
---
I just want to know how long this hype can last, or is it another short-term explosion
---
The incentive mechanism is quite clever, but the cost-benefit needs to be calculated clearly
---
I have to admit, I’ve been somewhat influenced
---
This feeling of "interacting while buyback" really gets you hooked
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTherapist
· 01-10 17:24
honestly the buyback pool mechanics feel like emotional anchoring at its finest... users think they're "participating in tokenomics" when really they're just watching sunk cost fallacy in real-time. been there ngl
Reply0
OnchainUndercover
· 01-10 06:52
The buyback pool logic is really clever, with fees directly flowing in, feeling like I'm mining for profits.
It seems like MemeMax has really studied human nature thoroughly this time, an irresistible feeling.
I just want to ask, will entering now just be taking over the previous positions, and how long can this hype last?
During the ranking push, I almost threw money in, but luckily I didn't get carried away... now I'm just watching from the sidelines.
The MP collection design is quite innovative, really clever in manipulating psychology.
However, the community's enthusiasm feels a bit excessive, always sensing something illusory about it.
$M's buyback mechanism definitely attracts people, but the risks aren't small either. It sounds good as a safety net, but it's really just gambling on luck.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-10 06:51
It's the same old trick again, buyback pools, fee flows, deep participation... It sounds like a cozy dream woven for participants.
The problem is, how many times has history already told us? Each cycle has a "new trick," and every time it's about capturing the psychology. When the bubble bursts, we realize that the sense of participation and the underlying value are two different things.
How long can this hype last?
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 01-10 06:50
NGL repurchase pool this set is indeed addictive, I can't keep track of the fee flow anymore.
Are the fees directly flowing back? Isn't this a disguised way to lock liquidity? The project team really thought it through.
Only when competing for rankings did I realize what a sense of participation is; I really can't stop.
Wait, isn't the fee during this pre-release phase a bit aggressive... I need to calculate the ROI.
The community's enthusiasm is so high, will there be a withdrawal wave later? I'm a bit worried.
Every interaction is helping the project accumulate the repurchase pool, I feel like a worker.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 01-10 06:48
Pre-release fee flow to the buyback pool, this logic is really clever, it's quite exciting
---
Opening packs to compete for MP, basically making you feel like you can earn money while playing, the psychology is perfectly calibrated
---
NGTL, this kind of participation design is really addictive, seeing the fund flow in real-time makes it hard to stop
---
The buyback mechanism provides a safety net, which is reasonable, but it depends on whether it can truly deliver value later on
---
The community's enthusiasm is so high, I don't dare say how long it can last, gotta stay calm
---
The design idea of $M is indeed innovative, the key is whether participants can keep their mindset under control
---
Interacting while buyback sounds great, but how well is the cost controlled?
---
Using a combination of incentives + participation, no wonder it became popular, but we must keep an eye on preventing rug pulls
---
I understand the joy of competing for rankings and collecting, just worried about what to do if the hype dies down later
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlert
· 01-10 06:41
Alright, this buyback pool design does have some substance. The fees directly flowing in feel quite transparent.
By the way, can the buyback mechanism really hold the price? It depends on how it's executed later.
The ranking system is indeed easy to get hooked on, but what about the risks... has anyone calculated them?
MemeMax's community operation this time is really on point, but we still need to watch out for the old tricks of rug pulls.
I didn't quite understand the opening pack mechanism; it feels like another gimmick?
This kind of participation design really taps into people's gambler psychology, haha.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 01-10 06:36
Another scheme that uses buyback pools to boost the price. How long can this wave deceive people... During the pre-release phase, fees go into the buyback pool, which sounds like a value support, but in reality, it's just making the retail investors cut their losses and pay the bill themselves.
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 01-10 06:35
Hmm, this buyback design does have some substance. I understand the logic of fees directly flowing back into the buyback pool.
Wait, can MP really be that valuable? Or is this just another round of retail harvesting?
The community's enthusiasm is high, but I'm worried it might just be a fleeting moment...
Have those competing for rankings all made money? It feels like the risks aren't discussed enough.
This "interacting while buyback" sounds great, but what about when it actually materializes?
I have to say, the design really hits people's greed points...
MemeMax has introduced new ideas in the community space, and recently everyone following it can feel the buzz. Opening packs, climbing the leaderboard, collecting MP, participating in the buyback mechanism—these are not just for show; users are actively involved in calculations and weighing costs and benefits.
Especially during the pre-release phase, every transaction fee flows into the $M buyback pool. This design truly taps into participants' psychology. It allows users to experience the project's operation while seeing real-time fund flows and value support. The feeling of "interacting while enjoying the buyback" indeed makes people deeply engaged.
In terms of community enthusiasm and user stickiness, MemeMax tightly combines incentive mechanisms with a sense of participation, which is no wonder it has recently become a focal point of attention.