In the BNB chain stablecoin lending sector, ListaDAO recently introduced an aggressive reform proposal LIP-021, aiming to turn the tide through a series of bold moves.
The reform plan unfolds in three levels. First is token burning—directly burning 20% of the total supply, approximately 200 million LISTA tokens. This move may seem radical, but the logic is straightforward: reduce circulation, increase scarcity. The second step is restructuring the incentive mechanism, shifting from a fixed 40% buyback to a flexible, incentive-driven approach, allowing funds to flow to stakers or for market expansion, thereby increasing capital efficiency. The third step is accelerating governance, implementing a 48-hour rapid governance process that significantly compresses the original cumbersome proposal procedures, with on-chain scripts executing automatically, greatly improving efficiency.
However, the assessment report from auditing firm CertiK cast some cold water. The code audit is less than 20% complete, with a security score of only 5 points, and the risk of centralization of power cannot be ignored. While the ListaDAO team acknowledges these risks, the reform process has already begun.
From a market perspective, whether this combination can succeed depends on the effectiveness of execution. Expectations of deflation, democratization of governance, and risk management need to advance simultaneously; any failure in one link could lead to total failure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiObserver
· 01-10 06:55
20% burn sounds great, but only 20% of the audit is complete? That logic is a bit backwards, huh
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 01-10 06:54
Burning 200 million tokens, this pace is a bit intense... I'm just worried it's the prelude to the final wave of cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 01-10 06:47
Burning 20% sounds great, but the audit is less than 20% complete... The contrast is really striking.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 01-10 06:41
Burn 20%? Sounds intense, but with only 20% code audit and a security score of just 5 points, isn't this just gambling...
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-10 06:41
20% burn sounds impressive, but the audit is less than 20% complete... Is this order reversed?
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 01-10 06:26
Burn 20% of the supply? Sounds intense, but only 20% of the code audit is complete... This is a bit uncertain, huh
In the BNB chain stablecoin lending sector, ListaDAO recently introduced an aggressive reform proposal LIP-021, aiming to turn the tide through a series of bold moves.
The reform plan unfolds in three levels. First is token burning—directly burning 20% of the total supply, approximately 200 million LISTA tokens. This move may seem radical, but the logic is straightforward: reduce circulation, increase scarcity. The second step is restructuring the incentive mechanism, shifting from a fixed 40% buyback to a flexible, incentive-driven approach, allowing funds to flow to stakers or for market expansion, thereby increasing capital efficiency. The third step is accelerating governance, implementing a 48-hour rapid governance process that significantly compresses the original cumbersome proposal procedures, with on-chain scripts executing automatically, greatly improving efficiency.
However, the assessment report from auditing firm CertiK cast some cold water. The code audit is less than 20% complete, with a security score of only 5 points, and the risk of centralization of power cannot be ignored. While the ListaDAO team acknowledges these risks, the reform process has already begun.
From a market perspective, whether this combination can succeed depends on the effectiveness of execution. Expectations of deflation, democratization of governance, and risk management need to advance simultaneously; any failure in one link could lead to total failure.