Imagine your stocks no longer need to be held in a broker’s custody, nor do you have to wait days for clearing and settlement. Instead, they become a string of digital certificates that can flow instantly across the global blockchain network—able to move freely while remaining compliant.
To use an analogy: if traditional finance is a rusty oil tanker, then Dusk is like equipping it with a nuclear-powered engine and wrapping it in a smart invisibility cloak.
In 2024, RWA (Real-World Assets) is just getting started. Now, we are witnessing Dusk turn the concept of "trading stocks on-chain" from science fiction into a new option for financial institutions.
**The core question: How to be both transparent and private?**
For a long time, blockchain has faced an awkward problem—it’s too transparent. Institutional investors cannot expose the details of every large transaction in front of the public, which is like revealing your hole cards at a Texas Hold'em table.
Dusk’s technology fundamentally solves this issue. Its core tool, Citadel, is like a digital Swiss bank vault, but with a twist: regulators hold a dedicated key that allows them to open a "compliance review window" when necessary. Using cryptographic black tech like zero-knowledge proofs, transactions can be fully transparent on-chain while hiding the specifics of counterparties and amounts from outsiders.
This is the way to break the impossible paradox—institutions gain privacy protection, regulators get a compliance window, and the overall market liquidity is activated.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
wrekt_but_learning
· 6h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound good, but can we really trust them?
View OriginalReply0
PretendingSerious
· 22h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; they can reassure institutions while satisfying regulators—simply put, it's a win-win situation.
View OriginalReply0
TokenStorm
· 01-10 06:57
Zero-knowledge proofs sound promising, but on-chain data shows that institutional wallets are still on the sidelines. It's hard to say how long this arbitrage opportunity will last.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-10 06:56
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but in reality, they just want to please both sides.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 01-10 06:55
wait hold up... "zero knowledge proofs" + "regulatory backdoor" = that's literally the contradiction they're trying to sell us lol. pattern analysis suggests this is the classic move—promise privacy while building in the compliance kill switch. ngl, flagged some sus wallet clustering around these RWA plays already. always DYOR folks.
Reply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 01-10 06:53
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but they still have to pass regulatory scrutiny; otherwise, they're just a paper tiger.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 01-10 06:51
Fast circulation? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another empty promise...
---
Zero-knowledge proofs sound advanced, but can they actually be implemented? That's the key question.
---
Finally, someone wants to put on clothes for on-chain finance instead of exposing transactions naked.
---
Will regulatory authorities really relax restrictions to let institutions trade stocks on-chain? I remain skeptical.
---
If Dusk can truly succeed with the RWA wave, it will definitely rewrite the game rules.
---
Swiss bank safes? Ha, sounds just like USDT's promises back in the day...
---
How to reconcile privacy and compliance, I want to hear their technical details.
---
Rusty oil tankers equipped with nuclear power? Let's see if it explodes first.
---
Real large-scale institutional entry is what counts; right now, it's all just hype.
---
This logic seems to solve the pain points that have been bothering me all along.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-10 06:50
Zero-knowledge proofs are basically like wanting to have your fish and eat it too, wanting to keep the fishbones. Whether it's feasible or not depends on practical implementation.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 01-10 06:42
Nuclear-powered engines paired with stealth technology—this combo is pretty awesome.
Dusk has really mastered zero-knowledge proofs; the idea of transparency and privacy being able to coexist was hard to understand before.
Institutional investors no longer need to reveal all their cards; they can keep their trading secrets safe.
Instant settlement versus several days for settlement—this gap is enough to change the entire game.
Can privacy and compliance coexist? Dusk says yes, I’m just waiting to see how it will be implemented moving forward.
Imagine your stocks no longer need to be held in a broker’s custody, nor do you have to wait days for clearing and settlement. Instead, they become a string of digital certificates that can flow instantly across the global blockchain network—able to move freely while remaining compliant.
To use an analogy: if traditional finance is a rusty oil tanker, then Dusk is like equipping it with a nuclear-powered engine and wrapping it in a smart invisibility cloak.
In 2024, RWA (Real-World Assets) is just getting started. Now, we are witnessing Dusk turn the concept of "trading stocks on-chain" from science fiction into a new option for financial institutions.
**The core question: How to be both transparent and private?**
For a long time, blockchain has faced an awkward problem—it’s too transparent. Institutional investors cannot expose the details of every large transaction in front of the public, which is like revealing your hole cards at a Texas Hold'em table.
Dusk’s technology fundamentally solves this issue. Its core tool, Citadel, is like a digital Swiss bank vault, but with a twist: regulators hold a dedicated key that allows them to open a "compliance review window" when necessary. Using cryptographic black tech like zero-knowledge proofs, transactions can be fully transparent on-chain while hiding the specifics of counterparties and amounts from outsiders.
This is the way to break the impossible paradox—institutions gain privacy protection, regulators get a compliance window, and the overall market liquidity is activated.