Market fluctuations are frequent, and idle assets are just sitting there. Have you considered using collateralized loans to activate your assets? Low-interest lending protocols like Lista DAO have recently become a new choice for many.



The core logic is actually quite simple—pledge mainstream cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH, borrow USD1 stablecoins at an ultra-low interest rate of 1%, then move to stablecoin financial products on leading platforms that can offer annualized returns starting from 18%. How exaggerated is this interest spread? Using 1% cost to earn 18% returns, it's basically an arbitrage machine.

What's even more interesting is that the BTC or ETH you collateralize still remains in your own account. If the token price rises later, the price difference is still yours. It's like generating two income streams from the same asset—earning from the lending spread and from the appreciation of the tokens.

What if you already hold interest-bearing stablecoins? Here's a more aggressive approach: directly use interest-bearing stablecoins as collateral, borrow USD1 for investment. Keep the original asset's interest income, and the USD1 investment becomes a new income stream. One principal, three revenue channels, with annualized returns directly reaching 25%+. Of course, such high-yield strategies require you to assess your risk tolerance.

Why is LISTA and similar tokens worth paying attention to? The sustainability of the ecosystem is evident—the transaction fees generated from lending are 30% used for buyback and token burn, continuously reducing circulation, and increasing scarcity. The growth of the entire protocol and the token's value support each other, forming a certain linkage.

In a bear market, operations that resist decline, and in a bull market, those that can take off—this set of strategies indeed offers many users new possibilities.
LISTA-5,25%
BTC-0,14%
ETH0,26%
USD1-0,03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PuzzledScholarvip
· 01-11 00:25
1% borrowing for 18% investment? Sounds too good to be true... By the way, can this kind of arbitrage really be stable, no traps, right? Hmm, wait, the collateralized coins are still in the account? How is the liquidation risk calculated? It gave me a scare. Lista relies on destruction to maintain scarcity... Feels a bit risky, not sure how long it can last. A principal with three lines? Arrange it for me, let's try it out first. Has anyone actually tried this? 25% annualized sounds a bit too dreamy. This wave indeed revitalized idle coins, but I'm worried the market might suddenly plunge and the contract could explode. Using stablecoins for staking and then borrowing USD1... Hmm, that’s an idea, but I’m still a bit hesitant. By the way, can lending protocols really be sustainable? Feels like a cyclical game.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageurvip
· 01-10 06:55
actually wait, the liquidation mechanics here are sus. what's the collateral ratio on lista again? because 18% yields usually means someone's eating the losses downstream, not just passive arb spreads.
Reply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 01-10 06:54
1% Borrow 18% Profit? I've heard this trick too many times, and in the end, you're the one getting liquidated. --- When the coin price drops, the collateral is gone, and you'll be crying before you know it. --- Using stablecoins to earn interest as collateral and then borrowing coins for investment— isn't that leverage? The risk is maxed out, buddy. --- It sounds very attractive, but very few people can consistently earn 25%, most are just cannon fodder. --- Wait, the collateral coins are still in the account? That doesn't sound right, there must be a problem with the details. --- The rhetoric of LISTA buyback and burn, every project says the same, but in the end, it all goes to zero. --- Bear market resilience? Come on, no project can truly resist a drop; it's all relative.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 01-10 06:50
honestly the whole "three income streams" thing reads like financial performance art to me—beautiful in theory, but the risk layering here feels more like a baroque composition than actual yield. the tokenomics burn mechanism is clever though, reminds me of scarcity as an aesthetic principle... but is it sustainable or just designed to look that way?
Reply0
DeFiAlchemistvip
· 01-10 06:45
*adjusts alchemical instruments* the transmutation mechanics here are intriguing but tbh the liquidation risk vectors feel... underexplored. 25%+ apy screams unsustainable equilibrium to me ngl
Reply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-10 06:37
This spread is incredible, but what about the risk, brother? Such a high annualized rate always feels like something's going to go wrong.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 01-10 06:30
Wait a minute, is this spread really that exaggerated? Feels like someone is just harvesting the newbies.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)